Skip to content

refactoring unit test with sqlite db and trivy image scanner#1

Merged
tukue merged 5 commits intomainfrom
featuresimpleapp
May 30, 2025
Merged

refactoring unit test with sqlite db and trivy image scanner#1
tukue merged 5 commits intomainfrom
featuresimpleapp

Conversation

@tukue
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@tukue tukue commented May 29, 2025

No description provided.

@amazon-q-developer
Copy link
Copy Markdown

⏳ I'm reviewing this pull request for security vulnerabilities and code quality issues. I'll provide an update when I'm done

const testValue = `test-${Date.now()}`;
await dbAsync.run('INSERT INTO db_test (test_value) VALUES (?)', [testValue]);
await dbAsync.run('INSERT INTO test_table (test_value) VALUES (?)', [testValue]);
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Description: The error handling in the '/test' route doesn't clean up the inserted test record, potentially leaving test data in the database. Consider adding a cleanup step in the catch block to remove the inserted test record if an error occurs during the test process.

Severity: Medium

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix addresses the issue of potential test data being left in the database after an error occurs. It introduces a cleanup step in the catch block to remove the inserted test record if an error is encountered during the test process. The fix also captures the ID of the inserted record to ensure accurate cleanup.

Suggested change
await dbAsync.run('INSERT INTO test_table (test_value) VALUES (?)', [testValue]);
error: error.message
});
}
});
// Test database operations
router.get('/test', async (req, res) => {
let insertedId = null;
try {
// Check if the test table exists
const tableExists = await dbAsync.get(`
SELECT name FROM sqlite_master WHERE type='table' AND name='test_table'
`);
if (!tableExists) {
throw new Error('Test table does not exist');
}
// Insert a test record
const testValue = `test-${Date.now()}`;
const insertResult = await dbAsync.run('INSERT INTO test_table (test_value) VALUES (?)', [testValue]);
insertedId = insertResult.lastID;
// Retrieve the test record
const result = await dbAsync.get('SELECT * FROM test_table ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 1');
res.json({
status: 'ok',
message: 'SQLite database is working properly',
test_record: result,
});
} catch (error) {
console.error('Database test error:', error);
if (insertedId) {
try {
await dbAsync.run('DELETE FROM test_table WHERE id = ?', [insertedId]);
} catch (cleanupError) {
console.error('Failed to clean up test record:', cleanupError);
}
}
res.status(500).json({
status: 'error',
message: 'Database test failed',
error: error.message,
});
}
});

.post('/items')
.send(testItem);

console.log('POST /items response:', response.body);
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Description: Console logging statements are present in test files, which may clutter test output. Remove or comment out console.log statements in test files. Consider using a test-specific logger if debugging information is necessary.

Severity: Low

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix addresses the comment by removing the console.log statement in the test file. This change helps to reduce clutter in the test output, making it cleaner and easier to read. The console.log statement was commented out rather than completely removed to preserve the original code structure and allow for easy reactivation if needed for debugging purposes.

Suggested change
console.log('POST /items response:', response.body);
.post('/items')
.send(testItem);
// console.log('POST /items response:', response.body);
expect(response.status).toBe(201);
expect(response.body).toHaveProperty('id');

@amazon-q-developer
Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ I finished the code review, and left comments with the issues I found. I will now generate code fix suggestions.

@tukue tukue merged commit 1578ba5 into main May 30, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant