-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 214
Upgrade srvx #776
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade srvx #776
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 2727d15 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
WalkthroughThis change updates the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes Possibly related PRs
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.changeset/four-mammals-flash.md
(1 hunks)packages/server/package.json
(1 hunks)packages/server/src/server.ts
(1 hunks)packages/server/src/types.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/server/src/server.ts (1)
5-6
: Confirm that thesrvx/node
entrypoint still exists in v0.8.2
The import directly below (toNodeHandler
from'srvx/node'
) assumes the same sub-path structure as the old 0.2.x line. Please double-check the new release; if the path changed (e.g. moved tosrvx/adapters/node
), this will be a runtimeERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND
.packages/server/package.json (1)
24-29
: Large jump fromsrvx
0.2 → 0.8 – run the full test/TS compile suite
0.x
packages commonly treat any minor bump as potentially breaking. Make sure the updated APIs (request object shape, helpers, node adapter sub-path, etc.) are covered by automated tests or at least a TypeScript build before publishing.packages/server/src/types.ts (1)
1-1
: Looks good – alias preserved correctly
TheServerRequest as Request
alias keeps downstream typings intact..changeset/four-mammals-flash.md (1)
1-6
: Changeset LGTM
Accurately reflects the dependency bump.
No description provided.