Skip to content

Conversation

@aphillips
Copy link
Member

This addresses concerns raised in #903

  • define option resolution as a term
  • require that option order is not significant

I was tempted to define the term resolved options, but held back.

This addresses concerns raised in #903 

- define `option resolution` as a term
- require that option order is not significant

I was tempted to define the term `resolved options`, but held back.
@aphillips aphillips requested review from eemeli and macchiati October 28, 2024 15:29
@aphillips aphillips added normative Issue affects normative text in the specification Agenda+ Requested for upcoming teleconference formatting Issue pertains to the formatting section of the spec LDML46.1 labels Oct 28, 2024
@aphillips aphillips merged commit db82a8b into main Oct 28, 2024
1 check passed
@aphillips aphillips deleted the aphillips-option-resolution branch October 28, 2024 19:06
@eemeli eemeli added this to the LDML 46.1 milestone Jul 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Agenda+ Requested for upcoming teleconference formatting Issue pertains to the formatting section of the spec normative Issue affects normative text in the specification

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants