Skip to content

Conversation

@eemeli
Copy link
Collaborator

@eemeli eemeli commented Nov 10, 2024

Fixes #928

Explicitly reserves the u: namespace, which was previously only mentioned in the syntax.

Limits spec option values to a-zA-Z0-9, - and .. The . is not currently used, but is needed to allow for e.g. 2.5 as a future reserved value.

Replaces two "MUST NOT" restrictions elsewhere with "will not" to match the style of the rest of the text.

@eemeli eemeli added normative Issue affects normative text in the specification specification Issue affects the specification labels Nov 10, 2024
@eemeli eemeli requested a review from aphillips November 10, 2024 16:20
@macchiati
Copy link
Member

I think this is going in the wrong direction, because it prevents us in the future from having function options with option values that are free-form. See my other comments.

Copy link
Member

@macchiati macchiati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had some older pending comments

Copy link
Member

@aphillips aphillips left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requesting changes due to the case sensitivity issue.

@eemeli eemeli requested a review from aphillips November 14, 2024 19:22
@aphillips aphillips merged commit 778d784 into main Nov 15, 2024
1 check passed
@aphillips aphillips deleted the stable-option-values branch November 15, 2024 15:17
@eemeli eemeli added this to the LDML 46.1 milestone Jul 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

normative Issue affects normative text in the specification specification Issue affects the specification

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Stability policy should cover option values

4 participants