Skip to content

Comments

Correct confusable pair for U+1D9F from U+1D4B to U+1D4C#1307

Merged
roozbehp merged 1 commit intomainfrom
roozbehp-open-e
Feb 21, 2026
Merged

Correct confusable pair for U+1D9F from U+1D4B to U+1D4C#1307
roozbehp merged 1 commit intomainfrom
roozbehp-open-e

Conversation

@roozbehp
Copy link
Contributor

See https://github.com/unicode-org/properties/issues/500

This needs a temporary patch to the code to skip the suppression of the new pair.

josh-hadley
josh-hadley previously approved these changes Feb 20, 2026
@markusicu
Copy link
Member

The changes lgtm, but there used to be one failing CI check for security invariants (because we don't have Identifier_Type values yet for new characters), and now we have two. Please take a look.

See unicode-org/properties#500

This needs a temporary patch to the code to skip the suppression
of the new pair.
@roozbehp
Copy link
Contributor Author

there used to be one failing CI check for security invariants (because we don't have Identifier_Type values yet for new characters), and now we have two. Please take a look.

The two checks are reporting the exact same errors. I don't know why there's two of them now, but I'm sure there's no new actual issues introduced by this.

@roozbehp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please rubber stamp, as I needed to rebase on top of #1308

@roozbehp roozbehp merged commit 833efb6 into main Feb 21, 2026
21 of 23 checks passed
@roozbehp roozbehp deleted the roozbehp-open-e branch February 21, 2026 00:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants