Skip to content

Conversation

@fireairforce
Copy link
Contributor

@fireairforce fireairforce commented Dec 9, 2025

Summary

closes: #2388

上游修复: utooland/next.js#78

Test Plan

添加了一个很大的测试 case

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @fireairforce, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a reported issue (referenced as #2388) by adding a comprehensive snapshot test case. The test is designed to specifically validate the behavior of the define configuration option when a defined value, such as an enum, becomes exceptionally large. By simulating this edge case, the PR aims to ensure the pack system correctly handles substantial define values, preventing potential failures or incorrect evaluations.

Highlights

  • New Snapshot Test Case: Introduced a new snapshot test under "crates/pack-tests/tests/snapshot/define/complex" to reproduce a bug where a very large define value in the configuration prevents the define mechanism from functioning as expected.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new snapshot test case to address an issue where define values, particularly large ones, were not working as expected. However, the generated output for the test case indicates that the define replacement is not being applied to the RoutePathEnum identifier. This suggests that the underlying issue might not be fully resolved, or the define transformation step is not correctly integrated into the bundling process for this module. The test, in its current state, does not verify the intended fix.

@fireairforce fireairforce marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2025 02:54
elrrrrrrr
elrrrrrrr previously approved these changes Dec 10, 2025
@fireairforce fireairforce enabled auto-merge (squash) December 10, 2025 03:10
@fireairforce fireairforce merged commit b05c93d into next Dec 10, 2025
16 of 19 checks passed
@fireairforce fireairforce deleted the fix-define-err branch December 10, 2025 03:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Utoopack] define 配置 value 过多会导致 define 失效

4 participants