-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
refactor(worker): use initSync for direct module init #2540
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @magic-akari, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the WebAssembly module initialization process within the worker. By leveraging the fact that the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the worker initialization to use initSync instead of the asynchronous initWasm. This is a good simplification, as the WebAssembly module is already available, making the synchronous initialization path more efficient and the code easier to follow. The changes are correct and well-motivated. I have one suggestion to improve error logging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR refactors the loader worker initialization to use synchronous WASM initialization instead of asynchronous, eliminating unnecessary async overhead. Since the WebAssembly.Module and WebAssembly.Memory are already available when the worker receives the message (passed via postMessage from the main thread), there's no need for async initialization.
Changes:
- Replaced async
initWasmwith synchronousinitSyncfor direct module initialization - Changed the
onmessagehandler from async to synchronous - Updated error handling from promise-based
.catch()totry-catchblock
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
Since the
WebAssembly.Moduleis already available when the worker receives the message (passed viaevent.data), we can directly useinitSyncfor synchronous initialization instead of asyncinitWasm.This eliminates unnecessary async overhead and simplifies the code by removing the async branch that was designed for lazy module loading.
Test Plan
Tested locally by running the demo project. Awaiting GitHub CI test results for further validation.