Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @xusd320, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request modernizes the project's core dependencies and internal architecture, particularly around module graph processing and chunking contexts. The changes streamline how module IDs and unused references are managed, enhance configuration flexibility, and update the underlying SWC toolchain. These updates are foundational for future improvements in performance and maintainability. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a significant set of changes, primarily focused on updating dependencies like swc_core and refactoring the module graph handling within Turbopack. The changes simplify APIs by removing trait objects for module ID strategies and introducing more explicit and robust methods for creating module graphs and handling unused references. The dependency updates are extensive and bring the project up to date with next.js@16.2. Overall, these changes improve maintainability and modernize the codebase. My review found one potential compilation issue in the library chunking context.
0f1a399 to
5bef7ce
Compare
55eaed8 to
f419bb2
Compare
📊 Performance Benchmark Report (with-antd)🚀 Utoopack Performance Report: Async Task Scheduling Overhead AnalysisReport ID: 📊 Executive SummaryThis report analyzes the performance of Utoopack/Turbopack, covering the full spectrum of the Performance Analysis Protocol (P0-P4). Key Findings
Workload Distribution by Tier
⚡ Parallelization Analysis (P0-P2)Thread Utilization
Assessment: With 5 threads available, achieving 8.6x parallelism indicates reasonable throughput. 📈 Top 20 Tasks (Global)These are the most significant tasks by total duration:
🔍 Deep Dive by Tier🔴 Tier 1: Runtime & Resolution (P0)Focus: Task scheduling and dependency resolution.
Potential P0 Issues:
🟠 Tier 2: Physical & Resource Barriers (P1)Focus: Hardware utilization, I/O, and heavy monoliths.
Potential P1 Issues:
🟡 Tier 3: Architecture & Asset Pipeline (P2-P3)Focus: Global state and transformation pipeline.
💡 Recommendations (Prioritized P0-P2)🚨 Critical: (P0) ImprovementProblem: 171.3% thread utilization.
|
| Signal | Status | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Tracing Noise (P0) | 63.4% of tasks < 10µs | |
| Thread Utilization (P0) | ✅ Good | 171.3% utilization |
| Heavy Monoliths (P1) | 16 tasks > 100ms | |
| Asset Pipeline (P3) | 🔍 Review | 4,326.9 ms total |
| Bridge/Interop (P4) | ✅ Low | 0.0 ms total |
🎯 Action Items (Comprehensive P0-P4)
- [P0] Investigate task scheduling gaps for incremental gains
- [P1] Breakdown heavy monolith tasks (>100ms) to improve granularity
- [P1] Review I/O patterns for potential batching opportunities
- [P3] Optimize asset transformation pipeline hot-spots
- [P4] Reduce "chatty" bridge operations if interop overhead is significant
Report generated by Utoopack Performance Analysis Agent on 2026-02-04
Following: Utoopack Performance Analysis Agent Protocol
This pull request includes a series of dependency updates, refactorings, and API changes across the codebase, primarily focused on improving module graph handling, updating dependencies, and simplifying interfaces for module IDs and unused references. The changes modernize how module graphs and binding usage information are managed, streamline configuration and context structures, and update several dependencies to newer versions.
Dependency updates:
Cargo.toml, includingswc_core,modularize_imports,react_remove_properties,remove_console,styled_components,styled_jsx,swc_emotion, andswc_relay. Also updated git sources forinclude_dirandmdxjs. [1] [2]Module graph and binding usage refactoring:
Refactored the module graph construction and binding usage info retrieval in
project.rsto use new APIs (from_single_graph,from_graphs,binding_usage_info, etc.), and changed how unused references are computed and returned, now using theUnusedReferencestype. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]Updated the
module_idsmethod to return a concreteModuleIdStrategyinstead of a boxed trait object, and adjusted related context and config structures accordingly. [1] [2] [3]Codebase simplification and interface changes:
spawn_once_taskmethod fromBundlerTurboTasks, likely due to redundancy or changes in task handling.chunk_id_strategy::ModuleIdStrategyandUnusedReferences. [1] [2] [3]Configuration and context improvements:
content_type,query,module_type) to various config and condition structures to support more flexible configuration. [1] [2] [3]new_with_denied_paths_and_watched_ignoredfor more precise path control.Issue handling and diagnostics:
IssueFilterand using it inget_plain_issuesfor more flexible filtering. [1] [2]These changes collectively improve maintainability, flexibility, and performance, particularly in how module graphs and unused references are managed throughout the build process.