use the enable_pipe_errors instead of libc::signal

[sylvestre]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Summary

✅ 142 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 37 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing sylvestre:signal-2 (c78ccfa) with main (2e26454)²}

Footnotes

1. 37 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (23b11ea) during the generation of this report, so 2e26454 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[mattsu2020]

coreutils/src/uu/tr/src/tr.rs

Lines 41 to 43 in 20a5c3a

	unsafe {
	libc::signal(libc::SIGPIPE, libc::SIG_DFL);
	}

Does the above code also apply?

[sylvestre]

@mattsu2020 well spotted!

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)