Skip to content

Conversation

@yuankunzhang
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@yuankunzhang yuankunzhang force-pushed the migrate-chrono-to-jiff branch 3 times, most recently from eec07ae to 33f5ae7 Compare September 28, 2025 06:38
@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/overlay-headers (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/misc/tee (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/date/date-tz is no longer failing!

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

we have this failure (without an helpful error message)


    running 1 test
    bin: "/home/runner/work/coreutils/coreutils/target/debug/coreutils"
    run: /home/runner/work/coreutils/coreutils/target/debug/coreutils touch -m -t 202003080200 test_touch_set_mtime_dst_fails
    test test_touch::test_touch_mtime_dst_fails ... FAILED

    failures:

    failures:
        test_touch::test_touch_mtime_dst_fails

    test result: FAILED. 0 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 4189 filtered out; finished in 0.05s
    
  stderr ───

    thread 'test_touch::test_touch_mtime_dst_fails' panicked at tests/by-util/test_touch.rs:741:10:
    Command was expected to fail.
    stdout = 
     stderr = 
    stack backtrace:
       0: rust_begin_unwind
                 at /rustc/4d91de4e48198da2e33413efdcd9cd2cc0c46688/library/std/src/panicking.rs:692:5
       1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
                 at /rustc/4d91de4e48198da2e33413efdcd9cd2cc0c46688/library/core/src/panicking.rs:75:14
       2: uutests::util::CmdResult::failure
                 at ./tests/uutests/src/lib/util.rs:463:9
       3: uutests::util::UCommand::fails
                 at ./tests/uutests/src/lib/util.rs:2016:9
       4: tests::test_touch::test_touch_mtime_dst_fails
                 at ./tests/by-util/test_touch.rs:738:5
       5: tests::test_touch::test_touch_mtime_dst_fails::{{closure}}
                 at ./tests/by-util/test_touch.rs:729:32
       6: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
                 at /rustc/4d91de4e48198da2e33413efdcd9cd2cc0c46688/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5
       7: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
                 at /rustc/4d91de4e48198da2e33413efdcd9cd2cc0c46688/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5
    note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.

error: test run failed

@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/overlay-headers (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/date/date-tz is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/misc/realpath is no longer failing!

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 28, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #8755 will not alter performance

Comparing yuankunzhang:migrate-chrono-to-jiff (6625d0b) with main (4c68e1e)

Summary

✅ 106 untouched
⏩ 73 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 73 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@yuankunzhang yuankunzhang force-pushed the migrate-chrono-to-jiff branch 3 times, most recently from b4a215b to da4ca61 Compare October 1, 2025 14:56
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2025

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/misc/tee (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/date/date-tz is no longer failing!

@cakebaker cakebaker force-pushed the migrate-chrono-to-jiff branch from da4ca61 to 6625d0b Compare October 22, 2025 14:32
@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/overlay-headers (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/date/date-tz is no longer failing!

@cakebaker
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this PR as I think most has been covered by #8843. Thanks anyway!

@cakebaker cakebaker closed this Oct 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants