cksum: small improvements, l10n #9532

Performance Regression: -16.39%

⚡ 1 improvement
❌ 13 regressions
✅ 112 untouched
⏩ 6 skipped¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Change
❌	`wc_bytes_synthetic[500]`	163.9 µs	182.4 µs	-10.16%
❌	`cksum_blake3`	190.7 µs	207.7 µs	-8.17%
❌	`b64_decode_ignore_garbage_synthetic`	149.2 µs	166.8 µs	-10.51%
❌	`b64_decode_synthetic`	149.1 µs	168.8 µs	-11.72%
❌	`b64_encode_synthetic`	146.3 µs	164.4 µs	-11.03%
⚡	`sort_ascii_c_locale`	22.7 ms	21.7 ms	+4.51%
❌	`sort_reverse_mixed`	38.2 ms	39.2 ms	-2.57%
❌	`ls_recursive_wide_tree[(10000, 1000)]`	51.3 ms	52.5 ms	-2.33%
❌	`mv_single_file`	129.7 ms	136 ms	-4.6%
❌	`mv_force_overwrite`	125.3 ms	138.4 ms	-9.47%
❌	`cp_large_file[16]`	341.3 µs	358.5 µs	-4.8%
❌	`split_number_chunks`	275.4 µs	287.7 µs	-4.27%
❌	`rm_single_file`	106.6 ms	119.6 ms	-10.89%
❌	`factor_multiple_u64s[2]`	178.3 ms	213.2 ms	-16.39%

6 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩