Skip to content

Conversation

david-cortes-intel
Copy link
Contributor

@david-cortes-intel david-cortes-intel commented Jul 9, 2025

Description

RFC about discontinuing the static-link version of oneDAL.

This is mutually exclusive (and broader) than previous RFC here: #3253

Hoping to get comments from other UXL members (@rakshithgb-fujitsu @keeranroth )


* Do other UXL members rely on the static-link files?
* Are there any known consumers of the static-link oneDAL library?
* Would it be better to remove the static-link library altogether, or to leave
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i would say it should be feasible to only keep build system support and have build and smoke test validation

As example - oneDNN only supports static through opensource build

@Alexandr-Solovev
Copy link
Contributor

I guess it makes sense to mention this pr in description #3237
and you also have incorrect link to older rfc pr #3253

@david-cortes-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

I guess it makes sense to mention this pr in description #3237 and you also have incorrect link to older rfc pr #3253

Updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants