Open
Conversation
Owner
|
That looks correct! Not sure what's wrong with CI though. |
Owner
|
Yeah, the CI failure is real, I can reproduce with |
|
Is this a bug users should be worried about? |
rescbr
added a commit
to rescbr/pixz
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2026
rescbr
added a commit
to rescbr/pixz
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2026
This reverts commit 87f55a4.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In
write.cLine 263,partsis compared againstBLOCK_INdespite dealing with output, and the correspondingblock_deallocchecksBLOCK_OUTinstead. Is this a typo?The corresponding
block_dealloc: