Skip to content

Upgrade the Golang Dependencies#19389

Open
vitess-bot wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
upgrade-go-deps-on-main
Open

Upgrade the Golang Dependencies#19389
vitess-bot wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
upgrade-go-deps-on-main

Conversation

@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This Pull Request updates all the Golang dependencies to their latest version using go get -u ./....

cc @vitessio/release

Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@vitess-bot vitess-bot added Component: General Changes throughout the code base go Type: Dependencies Dependency updates labels Feb 15, 2026
@vitess-bot vitess-bot added the Component: General Changes throughout the code base label Feb 15, 2026
@vitess-bot vitess-bot added Type: Dependencies Dependency updates go labels Feb 15, 2026
@vitess-bot vitess-bot requested a review from a team February 15, 2026 00:30
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v24.0.0 milestone Feb 15, 2026
@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Feb 15, 2026
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Feb 15, 2026

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@mattlord mattlord removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Feb 15, 2026
@timvaillancourt
Copy link
Contributor

It looks both @mattlord/I started PRs to address the linter failures for the AWS SDK (#19391 and #19366)

I'll close #19366 in favour of @mattlord's PR that seems further-along 👍

Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <tim@timvaillancourt.com>
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt enabled auto-merge (squash) February 25, 2026 14:34
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <tim@timvaillancourt.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Component: General Changes throughout the code base go Type: Dependencies Dependency updates

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants