Update README.md #45
Closed
Update README.md #45
+3
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Wording changes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Description:
Summary
This pull request updates GuideLLM README. The changes aim to provide better guidance on GuideLLM's role in enhancing and evaluating LLM deployments for performance, resource efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.
Details
Updated Messaging: Refined the language used in the documentation to better convey the capabilities of GuideLLM in enhancing rather than just evaluating LLM deployments.
Enhanced Output Analysis: Adjusted the output messages to focus on the actionable insights for enhancing deployment performance, such as identifying bottlenecks and selecting optimal hardware configurations.
Improved User Guidance:
Revised sections of the documentation to provide clearer instructions on using performance metrics to enhance deployments, particularly in latency-sensitive scenarios.
Test Plan
Automation Testing: Verified that all unit tests pass after the messaging changes.
Manual Testing: Conducted end-to-end tests to ensure that the updated output aligns with the refined documentation and user expectations.
Additional Notes
Updated the changelog to reflect these changes.
Ensured all continuous integration (CI) checks passed successfully.