-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 277
resolve problem dynamic config #591
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @alikhabazian, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request delivers a crucial bugfix to the vLLM router, addressing issues that prevented dynamic configuration updates from taking effect without a full service restart. By correctly passing the application instance and making several constructor parameters optional with default values, the changes enable seamless, on-the-fly adjustments to the router's static backend configurations, significantly improving operational agility and reducing downtime.
Highlights
- Dynamic Configuration Bugfix: Resolved a critical bug in the vLLM router's dynamic configuration, specifically for static service discovery, enabling configuration changes to be applied without requiring a container restart.
- Application Instance Passing: Ensured that the
self.app
instance is correctly passed to thereconfigure_service_discovery
function when setting up static service discovery, which was a missing dependency for dynamic updates. - Constructor Parameter Flexibility: Updated the
StaticServiceDiscovery
constructor to include defaultNone
orFalse
values for several optional parameters (e.g.,aliases
,model_labels
,static_backend_health_checks
). This change makes the constructor more robust and allows for partial configuration updates during dynamic reconfigurations.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request fixes dynamic configuration reloading. The changes correctly pass the app
object during static service discovery reconfiguration and add default values to StaticServiceDiscovery
's initializer to prevent crashes when optional parameters are missing from the dynamic configuration. The review identifies that model aliases are not being passed during reconfiguration in dynamic_config.py
, and the type hint for the aliases
parameter is incorrect in service_discovery.py
.
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ def reconfigure_service_discovery(self, config: DynamicRouterConfig): | |||
ServiceDiscoveryType.STATIC, | |||
urls=parse_static_urls(config.static_backends), | |||
models=parse_comma_separated_args(config.static_models), | |||
app=self.app |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The config.static_aliases
from DynamicRouterConfig
is not being passed to reconfigure_service_discovery
. This means that model aliases will not be updated during a dynamic reconfiguration, which is a bug.
Pass the parsed aliases to reconfigure_service_discovery
.
app=self.app | |
app=self.app, | |
aliases=( | |
parse_static_aliases(config.static_aliases) | |
if config.static_aliases | |
else None | |
), |
[Router/Bugfix] Fix dynamic config in vllm router
Fixed dynamic config functionality in vllm router to allow config changes without container downtime. The changes include:
Testing:
Signed-off-by: [Ali Khabazian] <[[email protected]]>