[Bugfix][PD]fix non-working disaggregated prefill

[CaveNightingale]

What this PR does / why we need it?

Mainline vLLM fixes its disaggregated prefill in vllm-project/vllm#22598 . But it is still not working in vllm-ascend.
To be concrete, decoder instances crash before vllm's fix and hang after vllm's fix in ascend devices.
This patch allows disaggregated prefill to work.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Qwen3-0.6B 1P1D tp=1 dp=1

• vLLM version: v0.10.0
• vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@0fe8508

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix a bug in disaggregated prefill for vllm-ascend, which was causing hangs. The change introduces version-specific logic to handle differences in the ModelRunnerOutput API between vLLM versions. My review found a potential issue with the version checking mechanism, which could lead to crashes on older vLLM versions because it uses an exact version match, which is brittle.

[github-actions]

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM Ascend project. The following points will speed up your PR merge:‌‌

• A PR should do only one thing, smaller PRs enable faster reviews.
• Every PR should include unit tests and end-to-end tests ‌to ensure it works and is not broken by other future PRs.
• Write the commit message by fulfilling the PR description to help reviewer and future developers understand.

If CI fails, you can run linting and testing checks locally according Contributing and Testing.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@1b40665). Learn more about missing BASE report.
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2374   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   76.18%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      120           
  Lines           ?    13532           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    10310           
  Misses          ?     3222           
  Partials        ?        0           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	76.18% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[wangxiyuan]

quick merge to recover PD functin. The CI failure doesn't relate to this PR