Skip to content

Conversation

Potabk
Copy link
Collaborator

@Potabk Potabk commented Oct 9, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it?

Since #3284 merged, should discard some extra code that was previously done for version compatibility

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

Signed-off-by: wangli <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2025

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM Ascend project. The following points will speed up your PR merge:‌‌

  • A PR should do only one thing, smaller PRs enable faster reviews.
  • Every PR should include unit tests and end-to-end tests ‌to ensure it works and is not broken by other future PRs.
  • Write the commit message by fulfilling the PR description to help reviewer and future developers understand.

If CI fails, you can run linting and testing checks locally according Contributing and Testing.

@Potabk Potabk changed the title [Misc] Drop 010 related lines [Misc] Drop 0102 related lines Oct 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

I have reviewed the changes in this pull request. The change involves removing a forward method from AscendLogitsProcessor that was intended for version compatibility. This is a good cleanup that improves code maintainability by relying on the base class implementation. I did not find any issues of high or critical severity. The change is approved.

@wangxiyuan wangxiyuan added ready read for review ready-for-test start test by label for PR labels Oct 9, 2025
@wangxiyuan wangxiyuan merged commit a36e3da into vllm-project:main Oct 9, 2025
43 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
module:ops ready read for review ready-for-test start test by label for PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants