Upgrade DF to 51 #5189

Performance Regression: -47.48%

⚡ 1 improvement
❌ 74 regressions
✅ 1179 untouched
⏩ 623 skipped¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 128)]`	141.8 µs	164.7 µs	-13.92%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 32)]`	140.2 µs	163.4 µs	-14.21%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 2)]`	139.8 µs	163 µs	-14.23%
❌	`compare_int`	79.3 ms	141.3 ms	-43.88%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 2048)]`	171.7 µs	199.9 µs	-14.09%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 4)]`	140.4 µs	162.2 µs	-13.44%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 512)]`	152.1 µs	176.5 µs	-13.8%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 8)]`	139.9 µs	163.1 µs	-14.22%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 128)]`	566.8 µs	841.2 µs	-32.62%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 32)]`	566.1 µs	839.4 µs	-32.56%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 2)]`	564.6 µs	837.9 µs	-32.61%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 2048)]`	639.8 µs	918.5 µs	-30.35%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 4)]`	566.3 µs	838.4 µs	-32.45%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 512)]`	620.1 µs	893.9 µs	-30.64%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 8)]`	565.1 µs	838.2 µs	-32.59%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(10000, 10000)]`	229.3 µs	267.8 µs	-14.39%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(20000, 10000)]`	312.2 µs	384.7 µs	-18.83%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(9999, 10000)]`	121.8 µs	160 µs	-23.89%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(7500, 10000)]`	116.7 µs	149.2 µs	-21.8%
❌	`bench_compare_varbin[(10000, 128)]`	154.1 µs	177.2 µs	-13.06%
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

623 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩