PatchedArray: basics and wiring #7002

Performance Regression: -24.47%

❌ 11 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1095 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1522 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384]`	101.3 µs	116.1 µs	-12.71%
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768]`	148.9 µs	178.1 µs	-16.41%
❌	Simulation	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384]`	130.7 µs	152.8 µs	-14.43%
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]`	182 µs	241 µs	-24.47%
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]`	118 µs	147.6 µs	-20.06%
❌	Simulation	`old_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768]`	398.3 µs	443.2 µs	-10.13%
❌	Simulation	`take_10k_random`	209 µs	267.3 µs	-21.8%
❌	Simulation	`take_10k_contiguous`	270.4 µs	329.3 µs	-17.9%
❌	Simulation	`old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]`	473.8 µs	534.1 µs	-11.3%
❌	Simulation	`bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024]`	477.2 ns	535.6 ns	-10.89%
❌	Simulation	`bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128]`	317.8 ns	376.1 ns	-15.51%

_{Comparing aduffy/patched-array (a9ce27f) with develop (60847b0)}

1522 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩