chore: remove deps using machete #7146

Performance Regression: -24.79%

⚡ 7 improved benchmarks
❌ 7 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1087 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1522 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]`	178.6 µs	237.5 µs	-24.79%
❌	Simulation	`old_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768]`	402.3 µs	447.4 µs	-10.08%
⚡	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_contiguous_not_patches`	279.7 µs	249.1 µs	+12.28%
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]`	114.7 µs	144.2 µs	-20.46%
⚡	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_contiguous_patches`	279.4 µs	248.9 µs	+12.25%
⚡	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_dispersed`	328 µs	297.5 µs	+10.24%
❌	Simulation	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384]`	126.9 µs	148.9 µs	-14.78%
⚡	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_first_chunk_only`	313.8 µs	283.3 µs	+10.79%
⚡	Simulation	`take_10k_first_chunk_only`	274.2 µs	229.1 µs	+19.67%
⚡	Simulation	`take_10k_dispersed`	288.1 µs	243.1 µs	+18.53%
⚡	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_random`	291 µs	260.5 µs	+11.73%
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384]`	97.9 µs	112.4 µs	-12.89%
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768]`	145.7 µs	174.6 µs	-16.58%
❌	Simulation	`old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]`	477.8 µs	538.9 µs	-11.34%

_{Comparing ji/remove-dep (ed9c6f7) with develop (cda251b)}

1522 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩