-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Use Cases Updates #39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| Section 3 highlights the unified requirements derived from the analysis of prior | ||
| art and a conceptual model for sharing lists of Verifiable Issuers and Verifiers | ||
| and the format of the entries in the list. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know why GitHub is refusing to properly display this diff. I've tried to include lines 224-226, but it's leaving out the original lines 224-225, and treating my suggestion as just a replacement of line 226, so you can't click a button to merge this change. On the bright side, it's showing all of my suggestion, so you can manually apply this change with a quick copy and paste, or auto-apply this change and then delete the lingering lines 224-225.
| Section 3 highlights the unified requirements derived from the analysis of prior | |
| art and a conceptual model for sharing lists of Verifiable Issuers and Verifiers | |
| and the format of the entries in the list. | |
| Section 3 highlights the unified requirements derived from the analysis of prior | |
| art along with a conceptual model for sharing lists of Verifiable Issuers, | |
| Verifiers, and Wallet Providers, and the format of the entries in the lists. |
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Preview | Diff