propose to publish statement and statement_validation on crates.io#14
Open
propose to publish statement and statement_validation on crates.io#14
Conversation
the only change in this commit is to please clippy.
this code was only intended to demonstrate how the crate could be used on other crates
pchampin
added
the
request-publication
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I suggest that we publish
r2c2_statementandrc2c_statement_validationon crates.io as v0.1.0.This would allow implementations (oxigraph, rdf-types, sophia,...) to start implementing the R2C2 traits,
and experiment with cross-implementation interoperability.
There has not been much interaction on the repository, so if you think the current code does not go in the right direction, now is the time to speak up :)
If you think the code does go in the right direction, please also support this PR (approve, thumbs up, "+1"...). I would rather have explicit group support for actually publishing the crate.
NB: the changes in this PR are