Allow testing of issuers w/o verifiers. #93
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
I think any time there's no endpoint listed the test could be marked as skipped. As much as we would want to allow for issuer only implementations, we should also allow verifier only implementations. The specs themselves don't really differentiate, as they refer to "conforming processors" rather than implying a specific role. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The verifier tests should probably show as skipped rather than failed if a verifier is not listed.
However, I wanted to post this now to get feedback. Do we want to support "just issuer" implementations (I think we do)? Currently the code expects both an issuer and a verifier.