Skip to content

Conversation

@TimvdLippe
Copy link
Contributor

@TimvdLippe TimvdLippe commented Jun 1, 2025

The endpoint variable appears to be unused. Looking at the creation of the request, I think the intention was to use it in the URL. That's also what other browsers appear to be doing.


Preview | Diff

The endpoint variable appears to be unused. Looking at the creation
of the request, I think the intention was to use it in the URL. That's
also what other browsers appear to be doing.
@antosart
Copy link
Member

antosart commented Jun 2, 2025

Thanks! This LGTM, I wonder about the failing check, since very strictly speaking this seems a substantive change - although I would consider it a bugfix. I'll wait for someone else to chime in.

@mikewest
Copy link
Member

mikewest commented Jun 2, 2025

This is a small-enough fix that I think I'll just assert that it contains no editorial IP. Thanks for the PR!

@mikewest mikewest merged commit 5c12cbb into w3c:main Jun 2, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2025
SHA: 5c12cbb
Reason: push, by mikewest

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@TimvdLippe TimvdLippe deleted the patch-2 branch June 2, 2025 14:12
@TimvdLippe
Copy link
Contributor Author

A typo that survived 8 years in the specification 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants