#20 Reference exact test suite versions

[anatoly-scherbakov]

Issue #20 calls for adding tests. We actually have a section about Test Suites in the spec; I believe our approach to testing implementations of YAML-LD makes sense, but I added references to exact spec versions and changed the wording. I hope this will permit us to close that issue.

---

Preview | Diff

[TallTed]

lgtm, fwiw

[w3cbot]

This was discussed during the #json-ld meeting on 18 February 2026.

View the transcript

Pull Request 168 #20 Reference exact test suite versions (by anatoly-scherbakov)

bigbluehat: merging

bigbluehat: editorial PRs can be merged directly without discussion

<Zakim> ivan, you wanted to meta issue

ivan: we should not work on CG document anymore

ivan: respec header must be changed to WG document

ivan: CG-DRAFT to ED

bigbluehat: can handle this in my PR

<TallTed> "editorial PRs can be merged directly without discussion" but should exist for at least a few days before they get merged, to allow for me and others to catch errors of whatever flavor.

<TallTed> It's a much lower lift to suggest changes to a PR than to create another PR.

<TallTed> Near-immediate merges obviate most of the point of working through PRs instead of direct commits.

Makes sense TallTed

---