Skip to content

Implement LLM-Based Re-Ranking for Evidence Retrieval#39

Merged
RonaldRonnie merged 4 commits intomainfrom
feature/llm-reranking-enhancements
Dec 24, 2025
Merged

Implement LLM-Based Re-Ranking for Evidence Retrieval#39
RonaldRonnie merged 4 commits intomainfrom
feature/llm-reranking-enhancements

Conversation

@RonaldRonnie
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Change relevance scoring to 0-10 scale (from 0-1.0)
  • Add evidence_k parameter for configurable evidence retrieval
  • Add max_sources parameter to limit final answer sources
  • Add performance metrics tracking for re-ranking
  • Update prompt templates for 0-10 scale with detailed guidelines
  • Integrate evidence_k and max_sources with field extraction
  • Update API models and endpoints to support new parameters
  • Add get_metrics() and get_rerank_metrics() methods

All acceptance criteria met:
✓ Evidence retrieval with embedding search
✓ LLM-based re-ranking step
✓ Re-ranking prompt templates (0-10 scale)
✓ Relevance scoring (0-10 scale)
✓ Configurable evidence_k parameter
✓ max_sources parameter for final answer
✓ Integration with field extraction
✓ Performance metrics for re-ranking

Closes #10

- Add Pydantic-based settings schema with validation
- Implement settings loading from file, env, and CLI
- Add preset configurations (fast, balanced, high_quality, development, production)
- Add settings CLI commands (view, save, load, preset, migrate)
- Support settings inheritance from base files
- Add settings migration system
- Create comprehensive settings documentation

All acceptance criteria from issue #11 have been met.
- Create comprehensive RAG Guide (docs/RAG_GUIDE.md)
- Update README with enhanced RAG features section
- Add RAG architecture documentation
- Add configuration guide with examples
- Create usage examples (Python, REST API, CLI)
- Add comprehensive API documentation
- Create migration guide (v1 to v2)
- Add troubleshooting guide
- Update CLI documentation with RAG features

All acceptance criteria from issue #13 have been met.
- Unit tests for contextual summarization (test_contextual_summarization.py)
- Unit tests for re-ranking (test_chunk_reranking.py)
- Integration tests for RAG pipeline (test_advanced_rag.py)
- Tests for embedding generation (test_vector_store.py)
- Tests for vector store operations (test_vector_store.py)
- Performance benchmarks (test_rag_performance.py)
- Accuracy benchmarks (test_rag_accuracy.py)
- Fix syntax error in unified_qa.py

All acceptance criteria from issue #12 have been met.
Test coverage includes:
- Unit tests with mocks for all RAG components
- Integration tests for complete RAG pipeline
- Performance benchmarks for speed optimization
- Accuracy benchmarks for quality validation
- Vector store and embedding tests

Tests use pytest with async support and comprehensive mocking.
- Change relevance scoring to 0-10 scale (from 0-1.0)
- Add evidence_k parameter for configurable evidence retrieval
- Add max_sources parameter to limit final answer sources
- Add performance metrics tracking for re-ranking
- Update prompt templates for 0-10 scale with detailed guidelines
- Integrate evidence_k and max_sources with field extraction
- Update API models and endpoints to support new parameters
- Add get_metrics() and get_rerank_metrics() methods

All acceptance criteria met:
✓ Evidence retrieval with embedding search
✓ LLM-based re-ranking step
✓ Re-ranking prompt templates (0-10 scale)
✓ Relevance scoring (0-10 scale)
✓ Configurable evidence_k parameter
✓ max_sources parameter for final answer
✓ Integration with field extraction
✓ Performance metrics for re-ranking
@RonaldRonnie RonaldRonnie self-assigned this Dec 24, 2025
@RonaldRonnie RonaldRonnie merged commit 4fb3a19 into main Dec 24, 2025
1 check passed
@RonaldRonnie RonaldRonnie deleted the feature/llm-reranking-enhancements branch December 24, 2025 21:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add LLM-Based Re-Ranking for Evidence Retrieval

1 participant