-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 162
Add Baseline regression notes #3187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2,12 +2,6 @@ name: Streams | |
description: The streams API creates, composes, and consumes continuously generated data. | ||
spec: https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/ | ||
group: streams | ||
# TODO: https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/issues/1971 | ||
# Status changed: https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/pull/2358, https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/pull/2491 | ||
# 2024-12-19 — low → false — Regressed status to match Caniuse, which considers support beginning at BYOB shipping. | ||
# 2025-01-30 — false → high — Split BYOB into a separate "readable-byte-streams" feature. Linked that one to Caniuse. | ||
# References: | ||
# - https://caniuse.com/streams | ||
Comment on lines
-5
to
-10
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I fussed over this for a while and ended up deciding to omit the note entirely. The first note would say that the feature regressed, the second note would be some new category (advance? unregression?) showing that we more or less reverted the second note. It seemed to me that the correct course of action in that scenario would be to withdraw the note, so that's what I've done. |
||
status: | ||
compute_from: | ||
- api.ReadableStream | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For any kind of extraordinary status change, it might also be useful to the tools consuming this info to encode it into the note:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good suggestion. I've made changes along these lines with fccb850. It also meant that I could drop boilerplate text from each message.