Skip to content

Conversation

@johnsonw
Copy link
Contributor

Bump release from 0.12.0 to 0.12.1

Release includes:

  • Ignore LQA quotas

Release includes:
  - Ignore LQA quotas

Signed-off-by: William Johnson <wjohnson@whamcloud.com>
@johnsonw johnsonw self-assigned this Oct 31, 2025
@johnsonw johnsonw requested a review from jgrund as a code owner October 31, 2025 21:14
@johnsonw johnsonw added the chore label Oct 31, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.93%. Comparing base (8ea5ec0) to head (3f07764).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #121   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.93%   93.93%           
=======================================
  Files          44       44           
  Lines        5573     5573           
  Branches     5573     5573           
=======================================
  Hits         5235     5235           
  Misses        269      269           
  Partials       69       69           
Flag Coverage Δ
2_14_0_ddn133 34.74% <ø> (ø)
2_14_0_ddn145 35.72% <ø> (ø)
all-tests 93.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 31, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchjohnsonw/bump-to-0.12.1
Testbedci-runner
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
nanoseconds (ns)
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
parse_benchmarks/combine_performance📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
130,430,000.00 ns
(-71.60%)Baseline: 459,331,428.57 ns
-1,117,593,112.26 ns
(-856.85%)
2,036,255,969.40 ns
(6.41%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@github-actions
Copy link

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchjohnsonw/bump-to-0.12.1
Testbedci-runner

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkD1 Miss Ratemisses (%)D1mrmisses (reads) x 1e3D1mwmisses (writes) x 1e3DLmrmisses (reads)DLmwmisses (writes) x 1e3Drreads x 1e6Dwwrites x 1e6Estimated Cyclescycles x 1e6I1 Miss Ratemisses (%)I1mrmisses (reads) x 1e3ILmrmisses (reads)InstructionsBenchmark Result
instructions x 1e6
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
instructions x 1e6
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
instructions x 1e6
(Limit %)
L1 Hit Ratehits (%)L1 Hitshits x 1e6LL Hit Ratehits (%)LL Hitshits x 1e3LL Miss Ratemisses (%)LLd Miss Ratemisses (%)LLi Miss Ratemisses (%)RAM Hit Ratehits (%)RAM Hitshits x 1e3Total read+writereads/writes x 1e6
lustre_metrics::memory_benches::bench_encode_lustre_metrics with_setup:generate_records()📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.93 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
25.22 reads x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
9.18 writes x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
113.00 reads📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
6.45 writes x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
2.47 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.22 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.80 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.01 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.03 reads x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
879.00 reads📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.74 x 1e6
(-31.16%)Baseline: 15.60 x 1e6
1.95 x 1e6
(18.17%)
29.26 x 1e6
(36.72%)
📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
99.75 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.40 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.19 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
27.98 x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.05 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.18 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.01 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.05 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
7.45 x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.43 x 1e6
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 31, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchjohnsonw/bump-to-0.12.1
Testbedci-runner

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results
Benchmarkavg_runtime_rss_mibMeasure (MiB)avg_runtime_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)end_rss_mibMeasure (MiB)end_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)memory_growth_mibMeasure (MiB)peak_over_start_rss_ratioMeasure (units)peak_over_start_virtual_ratioMeasure (units)peak_rss_mibBenchmark Result
Measure (MiB)
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
Measure (MiB)
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
Measure (MiB)
(Limit %)
peak_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)start_rss_mibMeasure (MiB)start_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)virtual_growth_mibMeasure (MiB)
scrape_allocations📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
44.50 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
876.63 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
44.57 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
876.72 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.33 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.03 units📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.02 units📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
45.74 MiB
(-56.21%)Baseline: 104.44 MiB
-174.58 MiB
(-381.68%)
383.46 MiB
(11.93%)
📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
878.81 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
44.24 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
871.37 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
5.35 MiB
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@utopiabound utopiabound added this to the 2025102800 milestone Nov 3, 2025
@gaurangtapase gaurangtapase merged commit 07b820a into main Nov 4, 2025
20 checks passed
@gaurangtapase gaurangtapase deleted the johnsonw/bump-to-0.12.1 branch November 4, 2025 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants