Skip to content

Conversation

@MohamadJaara
Copy link
Member

@MohamadJaara MohamadJaara commented Feb 13, 2026


PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

  • The PR Title

    • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
    • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
    • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³
  • The PR Description

    • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

What's new in this PR?

Issues

adding a skill for LLMs to make it easy to migrate tests from mockative to mokkery, with example of migrating 2 test calsses

usage example

$mockative-to-mokkery-migration migrate UserPropertyRepositoryTest

Needs releases with:

  • GitHub link to other pull request

Testing

Test Coverage (Optional)

  • I have added automated test to this contribution

How to Test

Briefly describe how this change was tested and if applicable the exact steps taken to verify that it works as expected.

Notes (Optional)

Specify here any other facts that you think are important for this issue.

Attachments (Optional)

Attachments like images, videos, etc. (drag and drop in the text box)


PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

  • Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

  • If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

References
  1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
  2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
  3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Test Results

0 tests   - 4 362   0 ✅  - 4 245   0s ⏱️ - 5m 33s
0 suites  -   728   0 💤  -   117 
0 files    -   728   0 ❌ ±    0 

Results for commit 2a68a5e. ± Comparison against base commit 952cadd.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.58%. Comparing base (952cadd) to head (2a68a5e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3863   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    59.58%   59.58%           
========================================
  Files         1904     1904           
  Lines        59718    59718           
  Branches      6485     6485           
========================================
+ Hits         35582    35584    +2     
  Misses       21163    21163           
+ Partials      2973     2971    -2     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 952cadd...2a68a5e. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants