Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @wizenink, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces standardized issue templates for bug reports and feature requests. The primary goal is to enhance the quality and consistency of issue submissions by providing clear, predefined structures for community members to follow when reporting problems or suggesting new features. This will help maintainers gather necessary information more efficiently and streamline the issue management process. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces new issue templates for bug reports and feature requests. The templates are well-structured, but I've suggested a few improvements to make them even more effective. For both templates, I've recommended automatically adding labels to help with issue triaging. For the bug report, I've suggested collecting more environment details, such as the software version, which is crucial for reproducibility. For the feature request, I've suggested pre-filling the title to encourage a consistent format.
| name: Bug report | ||
| about: Create a report to help us improve | ||
| title: '' | ||
| labels: '' |
| **Desktop (please complete the following information):** | ||
| - OS: [e.g. Linux] | ||
| - Architecture [e.g x86_64] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To gather more comprehensive information for debugging, it's better to request more environment details. Renaming 'Desktop' to 'Environment' is more generic, and adding a field for the software version is crucial for reproducing bugs. I've also added a missing colon to Architecture for consistency.
| **Desktop (please complete the following information):** | |
| - OS: [e.g. Linux] | |
| - Architecture [e.g x86_64] | |
| **Environment (please complete the following information):** | |
| - OS: [e.g. Linux] | |
| - Architecture: [e.g. x86_64] | |
| - Software Version: [e.g. v1.0.0] |
| --- | ||
| name: Feature request | ||
| about: Suggest an idea for this project | ||
| title: '' |
| name: Feature request | ||
| about: Suggest an idea for this project | ||
| title: '' | ||
| labels: '' |
No description provided.