Only check whether fft is power of two when not using rustfft-backend#19
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @danny900714, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the flexibility of the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly updates the FFT size validation to be conditional based on the rustfft-backend feature. The power-of-two check for fft_size is now correctly skipped when rustfft-backend is enabled, as that backend supports non-power-of-two sizes. The associated tests have also been updated with the appropriate cfg attribute to run only when this check is active. The changes are logical and well-implemented. I have one suggestion to improve the readability of the conditional logic in src/lib.rs.
| reconstruction_mode: ReconstructionMode, | ||
| ) -> Result<Self, ConfigError<T>> { | ||
| if fft_size == 0 || !fft_size.is_power_of_two() { | ||
| if fft_size == 0 || !(cfg!(feature = "rustfft-backend") || fft_size.is_power_of_two()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While logically correct, this condition can be made more readable. By applying De Morgan's law, you can express the logic without negating a grouped expression, which is often easier to reason about. The rewritten form !cfg!(feature = "rustfft-backend") && !fft_size.is_power_of_two() makes it immediately clear that the power-of-two constraint applies only when not using the rustfft-backend.
| if fft_size == 0 || !(cfg!(feature = "rustfft-backend") || fft_size.is_power_of_two()) { | |
| if fft_size == 0 || !cfg!(feature = "rustfft-backend") && !fft_size.is_power_of_two() { |
|
Added a few tests for checking invalid fft size on other backends. Other than that, this seems perfect. Thank you very much for this contribution. This should be released in the next version, along with your other issue :) |
Resolves #18