Skip to content

Bump kernel version#3051

Open
piraveena wants to merge 1 commit intowso2-extensions:masterfrom
piraveena:kernel-bump
Open

Bump kernel version#3051
piraveena wants to merge 1 commit intowso2-extensions:masterfrom
piraveena:kernel-bump

Conversation

@piraveena
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@piraveena piraveena commented Feb 20, 2026

Proposed changes in this pull request

To keep oauth component updated with kernel version for the release

When should this PR be merged

[Please describe any preconditions that need to be addressed before we
can merge this pull request.]

Follow up actions

[List any possible follow-up actions here; for instance, testing data
migrations, software that we need to install on staging and production
environments.]

Developer Checklist (Mandatory)

  • Complete the Developer Checklist in the related product-is issue to track any behavioral change or migration impact.

Checklist (for reviewing)

General

  • Is this PR explained thoroughly? All code changes must be accounted for in the PR description.
  • Is the PR labeled correctly?

Functionality

  • Are all requirements met? Compare implemented functionality with the requirements specification.
  • Does the UI work as expected? There should be no Javascript errors in the console; all resources should load. There should be no unexpected errors. Deliberately try to break the feature to find out if there are corner cases that are not handled.

Code

  • Do you fully understand the introduced changes to the code? If not ask for clarification, it might uncover ways to solve a problem in a more elegant and efficient way.
  • Does the PR introduce any inefficient database requests? Use the debug server to check for duplicate requests.
  • Are all necessary strings marked for translation? All strings that are exposed to users via the UI must be marked for translation.

Tests

  • Are there sufficient test cases? Ensure that all components are tested individually; models, forms, and serializers should be tested in isolation even if a test for a view covers these components.
  • If this is a bug fix, are tests for the issue in place? There must be a test case for the bug to ensure the issue won’t regress. Make sure that the tests break without the new code to fix the issue.
  • If this is a new feature or a significant change to an existing feature? has the manual testing spreadsheet been updated with instructions for manual testing?

Security

  • Confirm this PR doesn't commit any keys, passwords, tokens, usernames, or other secrets.
  • Are all UI and API inputs run through forms or serializers?
  • Are all external inputs validated and sanitized appropriately?
  • Does all branching logic have a default case?
  • Does this solution handle outliers and edge cases gracefully?
  • Are all external communications secured and restricted to SSL?

Documentation

  • Are changes to the UI documented in the platform docs? If this PR introduces new platform site functionality or changes existing ones, the changes should be documented.
  • Are changes to the API documented in the API docs? If this PR introduces new API functionality or changes existing ones, the changes must be documented.
  • Are reusable components documented? If this PR introduces components that are relevant to other developers (for instance a mixin for a view or a generic form) they should be documented in the Wiki.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal dependency versions to ensure compatibility and maintain system stability.

@CLAassistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


piraveena paralogarajah seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated the Carbon kernel version constant in the Maven POM properties from 4.10.33 to 4.10.126. This version change affects all direct and transitive dependencies that reference the updated constant while maintaining existing compatibility constraints.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Version Update
pom.xml
Bumped Carbon kernel version constant from 4.10.33 to 4.10.126, updating the resolved version for all Carbon kernel component dependencies.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A kernel grows from 33 to 126,
Carbon updates in the Maven mix,
Hops of progress, version leaps,
Stronger foundations, the rabbit keeps! 🌱

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description lacks most required template sections such as Goals, Approach, User stories, Release note, Documentation, Training, Certification, Marketing, and test details, providing only minimal context about the change. Complete the PR description template by adding Goals, Approach, Release note, Documentation, Testing details, and other required sections to provide comprehensive context for reviewers.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Bump kernel version' clearly and concisely summarizes the main change—updating the Carbon kernel version in the POM file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jenkins-is-staging
Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/22212458143

@jenkins-is-staging
Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/22212458143
Status: success

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jenkins-is-staging jenkins-is-staging left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving the pull request based on the successful pr build https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/22212458143

@jenkins-is-staging
Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/22610963388

@jenkins-is-staging
Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/22610963388
Status: failure

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants