Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces comprehensive support for agent-to-agent conversational testing alongside traditional interaction-based tests. It adds new schema definitions, documentation, configuration examples, and core implementation for executing agent-driven tests using OpenAI and Voiceflow. Documentation and navigation are reorganized to clarify the distinction between test types and provide detailed usage guidance for agent testing. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AgentTestRunner
participant OpenAI
participant Voiceflow
User->>AgentTestRunner: Start agent-to-agent test
AgentTestRunner->>OpenAI: Build system prompt (persona, goal)
AgentTestRunner->>Voiceflow: Send launch message
loop For each step (until goal or maxSteps)
AgentTestRunner->>OpenAI: Generate next agent action
AgentTestRunner->>Voiceflow: Send text message
Voiceflow-->>AgentTestRunner: Return response
AgentTestRunner->>OpenAI: Evaluate goal achievement
alt User info requested
AgentTestRunner->>OpenAI: Invent user info (if missing)
end
end
AgentTestRunner-->>User: Return test result and logs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/docs/tests/introduction.md (3)
22-22: Consider improving the introductory phrase.The static analysis tool suggests replacing "Because of that" with a stronger introductory phrase.
Apply this diff to improve the wording:
-It is important to know which [suites](/tests/suites) and [tests](/tests/interaction-tests) you can build. Because of that, you can find the entire reference on the [Reference](/tests/suites) page. Suites and test are defined as `yaml` files. +It is important to know which [suites](/tests/suites) and [tests](/tests/interaction-tests) you can build. Therefore, you can find the entire reference on the [Reference](/tests/suites) page. Suites and test are defined as `yaml` files.
33-33: Consider removing "of" for more concise wording.The static analysis tool suggests removing "of" to improve conciseness.
Apply this diff to improve the wording:
-All of the commands that are available in `voiceflow-cli` to execute the Conversation profiler are located within the [`voiceflow test` subcommand](/cmd/voiceflow_test). +All commands that are available in `voiceflow-cli` to execute the Conversation profiler are located within the [`voiceflow test` subcommand](/cmd/voiceflow_test).
37-37: Consider improving the introductory phrase.Similar to line 22, the static analysis tool suggests replacing "Because of that" with a stronger introductory phrase.
Apply this diff to improve the wording:
-It is important to know which [suites](/tests/suites) and [tests](/tests/agent-to-agent-tests) you can build. Because of that, you can find the entire reference on the [Reference](/tests/suites) page. Suites and test are defined as `yaml` files. +It is important to know which [suites](/tests/suites) and [tests](/tests/agent-to-agent-tests) you can build. Therefore, you can find the entire reference on the [Reference](/tests/suites) page. Suites and test are defined as `yaml` files.pkg/test/agent-runner.go (1)
455-455: Consider making the OpenAI model configurable.The model is hardcoded to "gpt-4o". Consider making this configurable through environment variables or configuration to allow flexibility in model selection.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
docs/docs/static/conversationsuite.json(3 hunks)docs/docs/static/conversationtest.json(3 hunks)docs/docs/static/swagger.json(3 hunks)docs/docs/static/swagger.yaml(3 hunks)docs/docs/test-platform/test-execution.md(3 hunks)docs/docs/test-platform/test-suites.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/tests/agent-to-agent-tests.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/tests/examples/agent-to-agent.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/tests/interaction-tests.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/tests/introduction.md(2 hunks)docs/mkdocs.yml(2 hunks)examples/suite.yaml(1 hunks)go.mod(1 hunks)internal/types/tests/testTypes.go(1 hunks)pkg/test/agent-runner.go(1 hunks)pkg/test/execute.go(2 hunks)pkg/test/runner.go(3 hunks)server/docs/docs.go(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
pkg/test/execute.go (1)
internal/global/vars.go (1)
Log(5-5)
pkg/test/runner.go (3)
internal/types/tests/testTypes.go (2)
Agent(35-37)Test(3-8)pkg/test/execute.go (1)
LogCollector(29-31)pkg/test/agent-runner.go (1)
NewAgentTestRunner(41-51)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
examples/suite.yaml
[error] 7-7: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/docs/tests/introduction.md
[style] ~22-~22: Consider using a different introductory phrase to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...tests/interaction-tests) you can build. Because of that, you can find the entire reference on t...
(BECAUSE_OF_THAT)
[style] ~32-~32: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ... in the same Voiceflow user's session. All of the commands that are available in `voicefl...
(ALL_OF_THE)
[style] ~37-~37: Consider using a different introductory phrase to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ts/agent-to-agent-tests) you can build. Because of that, you can find the entire reference on t...
(BECAUSE_OF_THAT)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (40)
go.mod (1)
42-42: LGTM: Dependency updates support new featuresThe dependency updates for go-openapi libraries align with the new agent-to-agent testing functionality that requires enhanced API documentation and schema support.
Also applies to: 45-45
examples/suite.yaml (1)
5-5: LGTM: Clear distinction between test typesRenaming to "traditional_test" clearly distinguishes this from the new agent-to-agent testing approach.
docs/docs/tests/interaction-tests.md (1)
1-1: LGTM: Clear documentation positioningThe documentation updates effectively position traditional interaction-based tests as one of two distinct testing approaches, with clear terminology and helpful overview context.
Also applies to: 3-4, 8-8
docs/docs/test-platform/test-suites.md (1)
54-54: LGTM: Improved documentation structureThe simplification reduces duplication and creates better separation of concerns by directing users to dedicated reference pages for detailed information.
Also applies to: 58-58
pkg/test/execute.go (1)
4-4: LGTM: Enhanced logging capabilitiesThe logging improvements support better log formatting (tab removal) and dual logging (local collection + global output), which aligns with the enhanced testing framework requirements.
Also applies to: 35-37, 39-39
docs/docs/tests/introduction.md (2)
1-1: Well-structured documentation update.The capitalization change improves consistency and professionalism.
11-32: Excellent documentation restructuring.The clear distinction between Traditional Interaction-Based Testing and Agent-to-Agent Testing provides users with a comprehensive understanding of available testing approaches. The use cases and descriptions are well-articulated.
docs/docs/test-platform/test-execution.md (4)
27-44: Comprehensive test type documentation.The new "Test Types" section provides clear and detailed explanations of both Traditional Interaction-Based Tests and Agent-to-Agent Testing. The structure, purpose, use cases, and execution details are well-documented.
54-54: Good addition of test type to execution metadata.Including the test type in the execution history provides valuable context for users reviewing their test runs.
69-69: Valuable addition for agent-to-agent testing.The mention of agent conversation history for agent-to-agent tests provides important information about the additional insights available for this test type.
73-75: Well-integrated execution types update.The addition of "Agent Test Executions" to the execution types list appropriately categorizes the new testing capability alongside existing execution types.
docs/mkdocs.yml (2)
59-62: Proper Google Analytics configuration.The consolidated Google Analytics configuration in the main
extrasection is well-structured and includes appropriate privacy settings with IP anonymization.
109-114: Well-organized navigation structure.The navigation updates properly reflect the new agent-to-agent testing documentation structure, providing clear access to both interaction testing and agent-to-agent testing resources, along with the new examples section.
server/docs/docs.go (3)
326-345: Well-structured AgentTest schema definition.The new
tests.AgentTestschema properly defines the required properties for agent-to-agent testing including goal, maxSteps, persona, and userInformation. The structure aligns with the testing framework requirements.
386-388: Appropriate Test schema extension.The addition of the optional
agentproperty to thetests.Testschema enables support for agent-to-agent testing while maintaining backward compatibility with existing interaction-based tests.
414-424: Clean UserInfo schema definition.The
tests.UserInfoschema is well-defined with appropriate name and value string properties to support user information context in agent tests.docs/docs/static/swagger.json (3)
320-339: Consistent AgentTest schema definition.The JSON schema for
tests.AgentTestmirrors the Go definition and properly defines all required properties for agent-to-agent testing configuration.
380-382: Proper Test schema extension.The addition of the optional
agentproperty to thetests.Testschema maintains consistency with the Go schema definition and enables agent-to-agent testing support.
408-418: Well-defined UserInfo schema.The JSON schema for
tests.UserInfois properly structured and consistent with the Go definition, providing the necessary properties for user information context.docs/docs/static/swagger.yaml (3)
117-129: LGTM! Well-structured agent test schema definition.The
tests.AgentTestschema is properly defined with appropriate field types. The structure supports the core agent-to-agent testing requirements with goal, persona, maxSteps, and optional userInformation.
156-157: LGTM! Proper integration of agent test option.The addition of the optional
agentfield to thetests.Testschema correctly enables support for agent-to-agent tests alongside traditional interaction-based tests.
174-180: LGTM! Simple and effective user info schema.The
tests.UserInfoschema provides a clean key-value structure for storing user information that agents can reference during testing.internal/types/tests/testTypes.go (3)
6-8: LGTM! Proper struct modification for dual test support.The addition of
omitemptyto theInteractionsfield and the new optionalAgentfield correctly enables support for both interaction-based and agent-to-agent tests in a single struct.
10-16: LGTM! Well-designed agent test configuration struct.The
AgentTeststruct includes all necessary fields for agent testing with appropriate types and serialization tags. TheUserInformationslice provides flexibility for passing contextual data to agents.
18-22: LGTM! Simple and effective user info struct.The
UserInfostruct provides a clean key-value structure for storing user information with proper Go conventions and serialization support.docs/docs/static/conversationtest.json (3)
21-46: LGTM! Comprehensive agent test schema definition.The
AgentTestschema properly defines the required fields (goal,persona,maxSteps) and optionaluserInformationarray. The structure aligns well with the Go struct definition.
113-122: LGTM! Proper test schema modification for dual test support.The addition of the optional
agentproperty and removal ofinteractionsfrom the required fields correctly enables support for both test types while maintaining backward compatibility.
139-154: LGTM! Clean user info schema definition.The
UserInfoschema with requirednameandvaluestring fields provides a straightforward structure for user information storage.docs/docs/tests/examples/agent-to-agent.md (1)
1-415: LGTM! Comprehensive and well-structured documentation.This documentation provides excellent examples of agent-to-agent testing across various industries and scenarios. The examples correctly follow the schema definitions and demonstrate realistic use cases. The best practices section at the end provides valuable guidance for effective test creation.
Key strengths:
- Diverse industry examples (banking, healthcare, e-commerce, etc.)
- Realistic user personas and scenarios
- Proper YAML structure following the schema
- Helpful tips and best practices
- Progressive complexity from basic to advanced scenarios
pkg/test/runner.go (4)
4-4: LGTM! Appropriate import addition for error handling.The
encoding/jsonimport is correctly added to support the improved error handling in the validation failure messages.
21-25: LGTM! Clean conditional logic for test type detection.The conditional check for
test.Agent != nilproperly identifies agent tests and delegates to the appropriate handler while maintaining backward compatibility with interaction-based tests.
53-55: LGTM! Improved error handling with JSON marshaling.The JSON marshaling of validation failures provides clearer error messages compared to the default Go struct formatting, making debugging easier for users.
62-71: LGTM! Well-structured agent test execution function.The
runAgentTestfunction follows good separation of concerns by creating a dedicatedAgentTestRunnerinstance and delegating the execution logic. The logging and error handling are appropriate.docs/docs/static/conversationsuite.json (3)
67-92: Well-structured agent test schema definition.The
AgentTestdefinition is properly designed with appropriate required fields and clear property types. The structure aligns well with the agent-to-agent testing functionality.
153-168: Good schema evolution for supporting multiple test types.The modification to make
interactionsoptional while adding theagentproperty allows the schema to support both traditional interaction-based tests and new agent-to-agent tests. The updated required fields appropriately reflect this flexibility.
185-200: Simple and effective user information schema.The
UserInfoschema is appropriately minimal with just name-value pairs, which provides flexibility for various types of user data.docs/docs/tests/agent-to-agent-tests.md (2)
1-149: Excellent comprehensive documentation for agent-to-agent testing.The documentation is well-structured, provides clear explanations with practical examples, and includes helpful best practices. The use of emojis enhances readability, and the content thoroughly covers all aspects of the feature.
129-129: Authentication link verified
The/overview/authenticationpage exists atdocs/docs/overview/authentication.mdand is properly listed under “Overview” inmkdocs.yml. No further action needed.pkg/test/agent-runner.go (2)
53-139: Well-implemented agent test execution logic.The test execution flow is properly structured with:
- Clear initialization and setup
- Proper error handling at each step
- Comprehensive logging for debugging
- Goal achievement tracking with final verification
171-223: Good handling of multiple Voiceflow responses.The implementation properly handles the case where multiple responses are returned by concatenating their messages, which provides a better user experience in the agent testing flow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
pkg/test/agent-runner.go (2)
36-39: Misleading comment about logging behavior.The comment states that this method "logs to both the log collector and the global logger for immediate visibility", but the implementation only adds to the log collector. Either update the comment to reflect the actual behavior or add the global logger call.
523-529: Add error handling for type assertions to prevent panics.The type assertions on lines 523 and 528 could cause runtime panics if the API response structure is unexpected. Add proper type checking to handle edge cases gracefully.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
pkg/test/agent-runner.go (4)
54-151: Consider breaking down the large ExecuteAgentTest method.The
ExecuteAgentTestmethod is quite long (nearly 100 lines) and handles multiple responsibilities including setup, conversation loop, and goal evaluation. Consider extracting logical segments into smaller methods for better readability and maintainability.For example, extract the conversation loop into a separate method:
+// runConversationLoop handles the main conversation loop +func (atr *AgentTestRunner) runConversationLoop(agentTest tests.AgentTest, voiceflowResponse []interact.InteractionResponse) (bool, error) { + // Move the conversation loop logic here +}
207-228: Extract message concatenation logic into a separate method.The logic for concatenating multiple Voiceflow responses is complex and could be extracted into a dedicated method for better readability and reusability.
+// concatenateResponses combines multiple Voiceflow responses into a single response +func (atr *AgentTestRunner) concatenateResponses(responses []interact.InteractionResponse) []interact.InteractionResponse { + // Move the concatenation logic here +}
500-505: Consider reusing HTTP client for better performance.A new HTTP client is created for each OpenAI API call, which is inefficient. Consider creating a reusable client as a field of the
AgentTestRunnerstruct.type AgentTestRunner struct { // ... existing fields ... + httpClient *http.Client } func NewAgentTestRunner(...) *AgentTestRunner { return &AgentTestRunner{ // ... existing fields ... + httpClient: &http.Client{}, } } // In callOpenAI method: - client := &http.Client{} - resp, err := client.Do(req) + resp, err := atr.httpClient.Do(req)
327-410: Complex method could benefit from decomposition.The
checkForUserInfoRequestmethod handles multiple responsibilities including message analysis, information lookup, and fallback matching. Consider breaking it into smaller, focused methods.+// analyzeInfoRequest uses OpenAI to determine what information is requested +func (atr *AgentTestRunner) analyzeInfoRequest(voiceflowMessage, agentResponse string) (string, error) { + // Move the OpenAI analysis logic here +} + +// findUserInformation looks up user information with fallback matching +func (atr *AgentTestRunner) findUserInformation(requestedInfo string) (string, bool) { + // Move the information lookup logic here +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
docs/docs/tests/agent-to-agent-tests.md(1 hunks)internal/types/tests/suiteTypes.go(1 hunks)internal/types/tests/testTypes.go(2 hunks)pkg/test/agent-runner.go(1 hunks)pkg/test/execute.go(5 hunks)pkg/test/runner.go(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- pkg/test/execute.go
- internal/types/tests/testTypes.go
- docs/docs/tests/agent-to-agent-tests.md
- pkg/test/runner.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
internal/types/tests/suiteTypes.go (1)
internal/types/tests/testTypes.go (1)
OpenAIConfig(64-67)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (3)
internal/types/tests/suiteTypes.go (1)
8-8: Clean addition of OpenAI configuration support.The addition of the
OpenAIConfigfield to theSuitestruct is well-implemented with proper pointer type for optional configuration and appropriate struct tags.pkg/test/agent-runner.go (2)
62-70: Good OpenAI configuration handling.The implementation properly handles optional OpenAI configuration with appropriate defaults and logging of the configuration being used.
413-456: Robust fallback mechanism for user information.The
inventUserInformationmethod includes a good fallback mechanism with sensible defaults when OpenAI fails, ensuring the testing doesn't break due to API issues.
️✅ There are no secrets present in this pull request anymore.If these secrets were true positive and are still valid, we highly recommend you to revoke them. 🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
pkg/test/agent-runner.go (1)
23-26: Misleading comment about logging behavior.The comment states that this method "logs to both the log collector and the global logger for immediate visibility", but the implementation only adds to the log collector.
Either update the comment to reflect the actual behavior or add the global logger call:
-// addLog logs to both the log collector and the global logger for immediate visibility +// addLog logs to the log collector func (atr *AgentTestRunner) addLog(message string) { atr.AddLog(message) }
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
pkg/test/common.go (1)
136-146: Use a switch statement for better readability.Replace the if-else chain with a switch statement as suggested by static analysis.
Apply this diff to improve code readability:
for _, msg := range br.chatHistory { - if msg.Role != "system" { - if msg.Role == "user" { - conversationSummary.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("User: %s\n", msg.Content)) - } else if msg.Role == "assistant" { - conversationSummary.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("Agent: %s\n", msg.Content)) - } else { - conversationSummary.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("%s: %s\n", msg.Role, msg.Content)) - } + switch msg.Role { + case "system": + // Skip system messages + case "user": + conversationSummary.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("User: %s\n", msg.Content)) + case "assistant": + conversationSummary.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("Agent: %s\n", msg.Content)) + default: + conversationSummary.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("%s: %s\n", msg.Role, msg.Content)) } }examples/tests/test_3.yaml (1)
16-16: Add newline at end of file.The file is missing a newline character at the end, which is a standard convention.
Add a newline character after the last line to follow YAML best practices.
examples/tests/test_2.yaml (1)
17-17: Add a trailing newline & consider relocating the$schemahintThe linter flags the missing final newline.
Placing the$schemacomment at the very top of the file is the de-facto convention for YAML-LS so editors pick it up instantly.-# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://voiceflow.xavidop.me/static/conversationtest.json +# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://voiceflow.xavidop.me/static/conversationtest.json +docs/docs/tests/introduction.md (3)
22-23: Tighten wording & fix pluralisation-It is important to know which [suites](/tests/suites) and [tests](/tests/interaction-tests) you can build. Because of that, you can find the entire reference on the [Reference](/tests/suites) page. Suites and test are defined as `yaml` files. +It is important to know which [suites](/tests/suites) and [tests](/tests/interaction-tests) you can build. Therefore, you can find the entire reference on the [Reference](/tests/suites) page. Suites and tests are defined as **YAML** files.
43-44: Remove superfluous “of” and capitalise product name-All of the commands that are available in `voiceflow-cli` to execute the Conversation profiler are located within the [`voiceflow test` subcommand](/cmd/voiceflow_test). +All commands available in `voiceflow-cli` to execute the Conversation Profiler are located within the [`voiceflow test` subcommand](/cmd/voiceflow_test).
48-49: Mirror earlier wording fixes-It is important to know which [suites](/tests/suites) and [tests](/tests/agent-to-agent-tests) you can build. Because of that, you can find the entire reference on the [Reference](/tests/suites) page. Suites and test are defined as `yaml` files. +It is important to know which [suites](/tests/suites) and [tests](/tests/agent-to-agent-tests) you can build. Therefore, you can find the entire reference on the [Reference](/tests/suites) page. Suites and tests are defined as **YAML** files.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
.gitignore(0 hunks)docs/docs/static/conversationsuite.json(7 hunks)docs/docs/static/conversationtest.json(5 hunks)docs/docs/static/swagger.json(5 hunks)docs/docs/static/swagger.yaml(5 hunks)docs/docs/tests/agent-to-agent-tests.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/tests/introduction.md(2 hunks)docs/mkdocs.yml(2 hunks)examples/suite.yaml(1 hunks)examples/tests/test_2.yaml(1 hunks)examples/tests/test_3.yaml(1 hunks)internal/types/tests/testTypes.go(2 hunks)pkg/test/agent-runner.go(1 hunks)pkg/test/common.go(1 hunks)pkg/test/execute.go(5 hunks)pkg/test/runner.go(3 hunks)pkg/test/voiceflow-agent-runner.go(1 hunks)server/docs/docs.go(5 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .gitignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- examples/suite.yaml
- docs/mkdocs.yml
- docs/docs/static/conversationtest.json
- pkg/test/runner.go
- docs/docs/static/swagger.json
- server/docs/docs.go
- docs/docs/tests/agent-to-agent-tests.md
- internal/types/tests/testTypes.go
- docs/docs/static/swagger.yaml
- pkg/test/execute.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
pkg/test/common.go (7)
pkg/test/execute.go (1)
LogCollector(30-32)pkg/test/agent-runner.go (1)
ChatMessage(18-21)internal/types/tests/testTypes.go (3)
OpenAIConfig(71-74)Interaction(32-36)User(38-41)internal/types/voiceflow/interact/interactResponseTypes.go (1)
InteractionResponse(3-6)pkg/voiceflow/interact.go (1)
DialogManagerInteract(16-86)internal/global/vars.go (1)
OpenAIAPIKey(8-8)internal/utils/closer.go (1)
SafeClose(10-14)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pkg/test/common.go
[failure] 138-138:
QF1003: could use tagged switch on msg.Role (staticcheck)
🪛 GitHub Actions: golangci-lint
pkg/test/common.go
[error] 138-138: golangci-lint (staticcheck): could use tagged switch on msg.Role (QF1003)
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/docs/tests/introduction.md
[style] ~22-~22: Consider using a different introductory phrase to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...tests/interaction-tests) you can build. Because of that, you can find the entire reference on t...
(BECAUSE_OF_THAT)
[style] ~43-~43: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ... in the same Voiceflow user's session. All of the commands that are available in `voicefl...
(ALL_OF_THE)
[style] ~48-~48: Consider using a different introductory phrase to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ts/agent-to-agent-tests) you can build. Because of that, you can find the entire reference on t...
(BECAUSE_OF_THAT)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
examples/tests/test_2.yaml
[error] 17-17: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
examples/tests/test_3.yaml
[error] 16-16: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
examples/tests/test_3.yaml
13-13: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Summary
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
examples/tests/test_3.yaml (1)
11-13: Remove hard-coded API key and use a placeholder instead.
Leaking even dummy-looking keys sets a bad precedent and will trigger secret-scanners.- voiceflowAgentTesterConfig: - environmentName: "production" - apiKey: "VF.DM.my.key" + voiceflowAgentTesterConfig: + environmentName: "production" + apiKey: "YOUR_VOICEFLOW_API_KEY_HERE"
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
examples/tests/test_3.yaml (1)
16-16: Terminate file with a newline.
yamllintflags the missing trailing newline (new-line-at-end-of-file).
Add an empty line after line 16 to satisfy linters and maintain POSIX-friendly files.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
examples/tests/test_3.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
examples/tests/test_3.yaml
[error] 16-16: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Summary
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
pkg/test/common.go (1)
234-241: Add error handling for type assertions to prevent panics.The type assertions could cause runtime panics if the API response structure is unexpected. Add proper type checking to handle edge cases gracefully.
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
docs/docs/tests/agent-to-agent-tests.md (4)
16-18: Broken image path – use relative doc-root path
src="/images/openai-agent-to-agent.png"assumes the docs site’s root folder, which breaks when the markdown is rendered under a sub-folder (e.g.,/tests/). Use a relative path anchored from the docs root (/docs/images/…) or a sibling relative path (../images/…) that matches the build system.- <img alt="OpenAI Agent To agent" src="/images/openai-agent-to-agent.png" /> + <img alt="OpenAI Agent To agent" src="../../images/openai-agent-to-agent.png" />
29-31: Second diagram likely suffers the same broken pathThe Voiceflow diagram uses the same absolute
/images/…reference; please adjust consistently with the previous fix.
123-124: Duplicated wording “Testing Testing”
(OpenAI-Powered Testing Testing Only)has the word “Testing” twice.-#### `userInformation` (OpenAI-Powered Testing Testing Only) +#### `userInformation` (OpenAI-Powered Testing Only)
85-88: Avoid showing plaintext API keys in docs samplesUsing placeholders that resemble real keys (
VF.DM.your-tester-agent-api-key) encourages copying sensitive values into source control. Wrap placeholders in angle-brackets or explicitly call out “DO NOT COMMIT”.- apiKey: "VF.DM.your-tester-agent-api-key" + # ⚠️ DO NOT COMMIT REAL KEYS + apiKey: "<VF.DM.YOUR_TESTER_AGENT_API_KEY>"Also applies to: 151-153
pkg/test/common.go (2)
69-69: Consider making the interaction ID configurable.The hardcoded ID "agent-interaction" could be made configurable to support different test scenarios or debugging needs.
172-172: Consider making the OpenAI API URL configurable.The hardcoded API URL could be made configurable to support different endpoints (e.g., for testing, proxies, or regional endpoints).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
docs/docs/images/openai-agent-to-agent.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdocs/docs/images/voiceflow-agent-to-agent.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
diagrams/agent-to-agent.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/tests/agent-to-agent-tests.md(1 hunks)docs/mkdocs.yml(3 hunks)docs/requirements.txt(1 hunks)pkg/test/common.go(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- docs/requirements.txt
- diagrams/agent-to-agent.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docs/mkdocs.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/docs/tests/agent-to-agent-tests.md (1)
67-70: Verify model namegpt-4ois actually released & accessible
gpt-4o(andgpt-4o-mini) were only announced recently and may not be available to all accounts / regions. If unavailable the CLI will fail at runtime. Either:
- Add a note that users must verify availability, or
- Default to
gpt-4o-mini/gpt-3.5-turbowhich have wider access.Also applies to: 82-85
1 participant
Improve logging and added agent to agent feature
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores