Skip to content

fix components typo to make the package instance happy#7316

Merged
waruqi merged 1 commit intoxmake-io:devfrom
Willaaaaaaa:patch-2
Feb 12, 2026
Merged

fix components typo to make the package instance happy#7316
waruqi merged 1 commit intoxmake-io:devfrom
Willaaaaaaa:patch-2

Conversation

@Willaaaaaaa
Copy link
Contributor

@Willaaaaaaa Willaaaaaaa commented Feb 12, 2026

This pr won't change, break or fix anything, because this variable key seems to be not used at all.

"Without this fix, the dependencies would be recalculated on every call to components_deps(), which could impact performance, especially in projects with many components."
--Gemini

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Willaaaaaaa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor typographical error in a variable name within the package dependency calculation logic. The change corrects component_deps to components_deps for better readability and consistency. According to the author, this specific variable key was not actively used, implying no functional impact from this correction.

Highlights

  • Typo Correction: Corrected a variable name from component_deps to components_deps within the _instance:components_deps function in xmake/core/package/package.lua to ensure consistency and accuracy.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • xmake/core/package/package.lua
    • Fixed a typo in the assignment of the _COMPONENTS_DEPS variable, changing component_deps to components_deps.
Activity
  • No human activity has been recorded on this pull request since its creation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes a typo in a variable name within the components_deps function. The change from component_deps to components_deps correctly assigns the calculated component dependencies to the cache variable self._COMPONENTS_DEPS. This ensures that the memoization works as expected, preventing redundant calculations on subsequent calls and improving performance. The fix is correct and valuable.

@waruqi waruqi added this to the v3.0.8 milestone Feb 12, 2026
@waruqi waruqi merged commit 20e2dbc into xmake-io:dev Feb 12, 2026
35 checks passed
@Willaaaaaaa Willaaaaaaa deleted the patch-2 branch February 12, 2026 13:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants