Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 5, 2020. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@ui-kreinhard
Copy link

Customized the gsa search client for retrieving clustered search results

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The API doc is wrong here, since the constructor only accepts an URL string now.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for the hint :-)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add some APIdocs here - and think about including a link to the documentation (e.g. https://developers.google.com/search-appliance/documentation/52/QuickStart/quick_start_se#dynamicresclust - maybe use the newest version, but you get the picture), as I'm not sure everyone knows what search "clusters" are. The term "cluster" usually refers to a load-balanced group of 2..n machines configured in the same way and serving the same purpose, not "group[ing] search results by topic".

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well , partly true - cluster is in textmining/datamining clustering has a different meaning. But you're definitly right, that there have to be a link to the google documentation

@iigorr
Copy link
Member

iigorr commented Sep 7, 2012

lets merge it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems the toString() function is using a wrong indentation (maybe tabs instead of spaces).

@thekid
Copy link
Member

thekid commented Sep 10, 2012

+0.9, see comment and suggestion on testability above.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants