Skip to content

Update bundled XSpec to v3.2.2#58

Draft
galtm wants to merge 5 commits intoxspec:masterfrom
galtm:xspec-3-2-2
Draft

Update bundled XSpec to v3.2.2#58
galtm wants to merge 5 commits intoxspec:masterfrom
galtm:xspec-3-2-2

Conversation

@galtm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@galtm galtm commented Mar 25, 2025

Description

Following the release of XSpec v3.2.2, this pull request updates the bundled XSpec. Changes include xspec/xspec#2055, xspec/xspec#2078, xspec/xspec#2045, xspec/xspec#2021, xspec/xspec#2027, xspec/xspec#2091 (new VERSION file), and several others.

Notes

@AlexJitianu, I don't know if this pull request is complete because I don't know how to build or test these changes, and I don't have solid Java skills. I'm calling this PR a Draft in the hope that you or someone else at SyncroSoft can take it to completion. If you run into problems on the XSpec side, let me know and I'll try to help.

galtm added 4 commits April 18, 2024 11:54
because XSpec now requires Saxon 10+ and Oxygen 24.1 is the first version that ships Saxon 10
because 10.6 is the version of Saxon in Oxygen 24.1
Reflects changes in SchXslt, XSLT code coverage,
and XSpec schemas.
@galtm galtm mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2025
18 tasks
@AlexJitianu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I will put it in one of our sprints.

- New VERSION file
- New CSS files and various modifications for color themes
- Contents section of XSLT code coverage report
- Schematron properties
- Schematron fix from XSpec v3.1.3 (#2027)
- Updated SchXslt
@galtm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

galtm commented Oct 8, 2025

  • Only the March 2025 commit is based on XSpec v3.2.2.

Make that "October 2025". I force-pushed this commit today with a corrected description that says v3.2.2. It originally said v3.1.2 (copy/paste error on my part). I made no changes in the file contents of the commit.

@galtm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

galtm commented Mar 23, 2026

Given that #59 has been merged, maybe this PR is no longer needed...

@AlexJitianu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I agree, it looks like I overlooked this. But #59 was merged so it's OK.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants