Skip to content

Conversation

@quinntaylormitchell
Copy link
Collaborator

@quinntaylormitchell quinntaylormitchell commented Nov 10, 2025

Description

As described in title.

Checklist

  • The PR satisfies the contribution guidelines.
  • This is a breaking change and that has been indicated in the PR title, OR this isn't a
    breaking change.
  • Necessary docs have been updated, OR no docs need to be updated.

Validation performed

Ran uv run pytest; tests run successfully.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Documentation

    • Updated integration testing documentation examples to display simplified pytest command syntax for enhanced clarity when running tests locally.
  • Chores

    • Streamlined integration testing task configurations with direct pytest command invocations for a more straightforward and efficient test execution experience.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Walkthrough

Updates pytest invocations across documentation and task configuration files to remove the python -m prefix, replacing python -m pytest with direct pytest calls while preserving all other arguments and test functionality.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation updates
docs/src/dev-docs/testing/integration-tests.md
Removed python -m prefix from pytest command examples, converting uv run python -m pytest to uv run pytest in marker listing and marker-specific test execution examples.
Task configuration updates
taskfiles/tests/integration.yaml
Replaced python -m pytest with pytest across three task steps: cache-clear, core test run, and py-project-imports test execution.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Homogeneous changes with consistent pattern applied uniformly across files
  • Simple removal of prefix with no logic modifications
  • Minimal scope affecting only command invocations

Possibly related issues

  • Issue #1571: Directly addresses the same pytest invocation standardization, switching from python -m pytest to pytest in taskfiles and related configurations.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The PR title accurately summarizes the main change: replacing 'python -m pytest' with 'pytest' across integration test configuration and documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@Bill-hbrhbr Bill-hbrhbr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's wait until #1574 is merged to merge this PR.

Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the PR title, how about:

refactor(integration-tests): Simplify `uv run python -m pytest` to `uv run pytest` (fixes #1571).

Shouldn't be chore because:
https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/c3a9be4c73e47f2e8197de775f41d981701407fb/index.json#L41

Comment on lines +16 to 17
uv run pytest --cache-clear --collect-only --override-ini addopts="" --quiet
> /dev/null
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
uv run pytest --cache-clear --collect-only --override-ini addopts="" --quiet
> /dev/null
uv run pytest --cache-clear --collect-only --override-ini addopts="" --quiet > /dev/null

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants