refactor(io_interface): Change WriterInterface to return ErrorCodes instead of throwing exceptions; address clang-tidy violations in WriterInterface.
#51
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request removes the implementation of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant WriterInterface
Client->>WriterInterface: Call API method (e.g., write, flush, seek)
WriterInterface-->>Client: Return ErrorCode
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/ystdlib/io_interface/WriterInterface.hpp (5)
4-6: Consider addressing the TODO comment.The comment references GitHub issue #50, and there's a clang-tidy suppression. If the issue is still relevant, it may be beneficial to add more context or open a new issue to track any outstanding tasks.
48-48: Potential endianness considerations.When writing numeric data, note that the bytes are in host-endian format. If cross-platform compatibility is necessary, add documentation or a conversion routine.
74-76: Additional TODO comment.If there are hurdles to implementing seek-from-current behaviour, you may wish to elaborate or open a separate issue.
79-81: Doc string reference to the 'read pointer' is likely a typo.This is a writer interface; consider updating it to 'write position' for clarity.
- * @param pos Returns the current position of the read pointer. + * @param pos Returns the current position of the write pointer.
85-86: Implementation detail on endianness.This writes data in the host platform's native byte order, which may differ across systems. Consider clarifying that if portability is required, users must handle endianness.
template <typename ValueType> auto WriterInterface::write_numeric_value(ValueType val) -> ErrorCode { + // NOTE: This writes in the host system's native endianness; adjust as needed for portability. return write(static_cast<char const*>(&val), sizeof(ValueType)); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/ystdlib/io_interface/CMakeLists.txt(0 hunks)src/ystdlib/io_interface/WriterInterface.cpp(0 hunks)src/ystdlib/io_interface/WriterInterface.hpp(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- src/ystdlib/io_interface/CMakeLists.txt
- src/ystdlib/io_interface/WriterInterface.cpp
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,tpp,ts,tsx}`: - Prefer `false == ` rather than `!`.
**/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,tpp,ts,tsx}: - Preferfalse == <expression>rather than!<expression>.
src/ystdlib/io_interface/WriterInterface.hpp
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
src/ystdlib/io_interface/WriterInterface.hpp (1)
src/ystdlib/io_interface/ReaderInterface.hpp (3)
pos(74-74)pos(87-87)offset(82-82)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: build-ystdlib-cpp (macos-14)
- GitHub Check: lint-check (ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: lint-check (macos-15)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/ystdlib/io_interface/WriterInterface.hpp (11)
16-17: No concerns with the default constructor.This is a straightforward approach that follows the standard rule of zero/three/five.
19-21: Deleting copy operations is consistent with a non-copyable design.This helps prevent unintentional copying of the interface.
23-25: Default move operations are properly enabled.This decision aligns with modern C++ design patterns.
32-32: Documentation note.Describing the write action in high-level terms is fine, no immediate suggestions.
36-36: Interface design using ErrorCode is appropriate.Returning an error code instead of throwing promotes better performance and clearer usage.
39-41: Flush method returning ErrorCode is consistent with the new error-handling approach.No issues found.
43-44: Documentation clarity confirmed.Stating the intent clearly for numeric writes is good practice.
54-54: Inline char writing is straightforward.No issues detected.
60-62: String writing implementation is sound.Carefully skipping the null terminator makes sense when only the string contents must be written.
65-65: Explicit seek_from_begin usage is good.No issues found with returning ErrorCode.
71-71: In-line documentation matches the interface style.No concerns regarding offset usage as a signed type here.
2 participants
Description
This PR continues #49 and addresses issues in
WriterInterfaceby performing the same steps. The most noticeable difference is thatWriterInterface.cppis completely removed since all non-pure-virtual functions are inlined due to their simplicity.Checklist
breaking change.
Validation performed
Summary by CodeRabbit
These changes enhance stability and promote clearer error management in operations related to writing functionality.