Add predicates for finding good and bad controls #104
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@vartikatewari heads up, it's happening!
@vartikatewari note we still need some negative tests that correspond to neutral scenarios
cthoyt
force-pushed
the
good-bad-controls
branch
from
efeeeb0 to
bfd41b7
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
References #86
This PR adds predicates for testing if a given variable is a good or bad control based on . This PR doesn't implement checks for neutral controls, as those don't have a ton of rules yet.
is_good_controlpredicate (@cthoyt + @vartikatewari)is_bad_controlpredicate (@cthoyt + @vartikatewari)