Cleanup ImplicitClone related stuff in the examples

[cecton]

Description

What does this PR do?

1. Use more cheap-to-clone types in the examples
2. Some examples got impacted by remove ToHtml trait #3453 (the removal of ToHtml), I fixed them so we can use reference where it makes sense (I added a few IntoPropValue on cheap-to-clone types)
3. Updated implicit-clone to the latest version
4. Optimized ChildrenRenderer memory allocations by using Rc

Changes did on the side:

1. In order to get some example working, I had to change NodeSeq to use IArray. This is good because it is more optimized for memory allocations too
2. Slightly improve the API of VChild to easily get a ref mut inside its properties object (just for convenience!)

Related to #3453

Checklist

• I have reviewed my own code
• I have added tests

[github-actions]

Benchmark - core

Yew Master

vnode           fastest       │ slowest       │ median        │ mean          │ samples │ iters
╰─ vnode_clone  2.484 ns      │ 2.524 ns      │ 2.486 ns      │ 2.489 ns      │ 100     │ 1000000000

Pull Request

vnode           fastest       │ slowest       │ median        │ mean          │ samples │ iters
╰─ vnode_clone  2.462 ns      │ 3.806 ns      │ 2.468 ns      │ 2.734 ns      │ 100     │ 1000000000

[github-actions]

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit c3accc5):

https://yew-rs--pr3508-cleanup-implicit-clo-47fnh718.web.app

_{(expires Wed, 03 Sep 2025 06:12:57 GMT)}

_{🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎}

[github-actions]

Benchmark - SSR

Yew Master

Details

Benchmark	Round	Min (ms)	Max (ms)	Mean (ms)	Standard Deviation
Baseline	10	310.529	310.827	310.684	0.103
Hello World	10	461.976	470.843	464.421	2.425
Function Router	10	1570.575	1595.179	1579.356	7.625
Concurrent Task	10	1005.577	1007.042	1006.354	0.452
Many Providers	10	1089.051	1120.011	1102.850	10.308

Pull Request

Details

Benchmark	Round	Min (ms)	Max (ms)	Mean (ms)	Standard Deviation
Baseline	10	310.398	315.395	311.092	1.518
Hello World	10	462.294	479.943	471.559	6.804
Function Router	10	1645.157	1675.293	1659.963	10.935
Concurrent Task	10	1005.018	1007.482	1006.512	0.649
Many Providers	10	1063.287	1100.758	1076.272	11.430

[github-actions]

Size Comparison

Details

examples	master (KB)	pull request (KB)	diff (KB)	diff (%)
async_clock	99.393	99.395	+0.002	+0.002%
boids	168.234	168.777	+0.543	+0.323%
communication_child_to_parent	91.684	91.750	+0.066	+0.072%
communication_grandchild_with_grandparent	102.698	102.776	+0.078	+0.076%
communication_grandparent_to_grandchild	97.713	97.771	+0.059	+0.060%
communication_parent_to_child	87.610	87.662	+0.052	+0.059%
contexts	103.828	103.847	+0.019	+0.018%
counter	84.416	85.170	+0.754	+0.893%
counter_functional	84.772	85.347	+0.574	+0.677%
dyn_create_destroy_apps	87.413	87.946	+0.533	+0.610%
file_upload	98.499	98.696	+0.197	+0.200%
function_delayed_input	91.803	91.805	+0.002	+0.002%
function_memory_game	170.152	170.798	+0.646	+0.379%
function_router	337.268	338.003	+0.735	+0.218%
function_todomvc	162.579	163.375	+0.796	+0.490%
futures	238.500	238.503	+0.003	+0.001%
game_of_life	104.475	104.536	+0.062	+0.059%
immutable	193.762	194.714	+0.952	+0.491%
inner_html	80.062	80.062	0	0.000%
js_callback	107.534	108.309	+0.774	+0.720%
keyed_list	195.801	196.530	+0.729	+0.373%
mount_point	83.428	83.430	+0.002	+0.002%
nested_list	112.514	115.165	+2.651	+2.356%
node_refs	90.797	90.862	+0.065	+0.072%
password_strength	1777.343	1777.411	+0.068	+0.004%
portals	92.571	93.322	+0.751	+0.811%
router	306.775	307.474	+0.698	+0.228%
suspense	111.543	112.323	+0.780	+0.700%
timer	88.673	88.777	+0.104	+0.118%
timer_functional	94.701	95.176	+0.475	+0.501%
todomvc	142.847	143.733	+0.887	+0.621%
two_apps	85.788	85.790	+0.002	+0.002%
web_worker_fib	134.242	134.886	+0.644	+0.479%
web_worker_prime	187.418	187.522	+0.104	+0.056%
webgl	83.027	83.027	0	0.000%

⚠️ The following example has changed its size significantly:

examples	master (KB)	pull request (KB)	diff (KB)	diff (%)
nested_list	112.514	115.165	+2.651	+2.356%

[cecton]

@kirillsemyonkin now I think the benchmark results look good. Not a big improvement but not a lost either except maybe on the "baseline" but that's probably normal.