Skip to content

feat: memory consumption during keygen#368

Draft
maksymsur wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
maksym/optim/2834/keygen-mem-consumption
Draft

feat: memory consumption during keygen#368
maksymsur wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
maksym/optim/2834/keygen-mem-consumption

Conversation

@maksymsur
Copy link
Contributor

@maksymsur maksymsur commented Jan 12, 2026

Description of changes

Issue ticket number and link

https://github.com/zama-ai/kms-internal/issues/2834

PR Checklist

I attest that all checked items are satisfied. Any deviation is clearly justified above.

  • Title follows conventional commits (e.g. chore: ...).
  • Tests added for every new pub item and test coverage has not decreased.
  • Public APIs and non-obvious logic documented; unfinished work marked as TODO(#issue).
  • unwrap/expect/panic only in tests or for invariant bugs (documented if present).
  • No dependency version changes OR (if changed) only minimal required fixes.
  • No architectural protocol changes OR linked spec PR/issue provided.
  • No breaking deployment config changes OR devops label + infra notified + infra-team reviewer assigned.
  • No breaking gRPC / serialized data changes OR commit marked with ! and affected teams notified.
  • No modifications to existing versionized structs OR backward compatibility tests updated.
  • No critical business logic / crypto changes OR ≥2 reviewers assigned.
  • No new sensitive data fields added OR Zeroize + ZeroizeOnDrop implemented.
  • No new public storage data OR data is verifiable (signature / digest).
  • No unsafe; if unavoidable: minimal, justified, documented, and test/fuzz covered.
  • Strongly typed boundaries: typed inputs validated at the edge; no untyped values or errors cross modules.
  • Self-review completed.

Dependency Update Questionnaire (only if deps changed or added)

Answer in the Cargo.toml next to the dependency (or here if updating):

  1. Ownership changes or suspicious concentration?
  2. Low popularity?
  3. Unusual version jump?
  4. Lacking documentation?
  5. Missing CI?
  6. No security / disclosure policy?
  7. Significant size increase?

More details and explanations for the checklist and dependency updates can be found in CONTRIBUTING.md

@maksymsur maksymsur self-assigned this Jan 12, 2026
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed The CLA has been signed. label Jan 12, 2026
@maksymsur maksymsur force-pushed the maksym/optim/2834/keygen-mem-consumption branch from 28de262 to 8f00408 Compare January 12, 2026 07:47
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Consolidated Tests Results 2026-01-14 - 21:46:16

Test Results

passed 4 passed

Details

tests 4 tests
clock not captured
tool junit-to-ctrf
build kind-testing arrow-right test-reporter link #816
pull-request feat: memory consumption during keygen link #368

test-reporter: Run #816

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Pending ⏳ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
4 4 0 0 0 0 0 not captured

🎉 All tests passed!

Tests

View All Tests
Test Name Status Flaky Duration
full_gen_tests_default_threshld_sequential_crs 2m 50s
test_threshld_insecure 3m 57s
full_gen_tests_default_centralzd_sequential_crs 1.8s
test_centralzd_insecure 1m 1s

🍂 No flaky tests in this run.

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

🔄 This comment has been updated

@maksymsur maksymsur force-pushed the maksym/optim/2834/keygen-mem-consumption branch from 8f00408 to fc19d83 Compare January 12, 2026 21:21
@maksymsur maksymsur force-pushed the maksym/optim/2834/keygen-mem-consumption branch from 64d9e54 to e740606 Compare January 14, 2026 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla-signed The CLA has been signed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant