Skip to content

Conversation

@bquorning
Copy link
Member

@bquorning bquorning commented Nov 5, 2025

Let’s use StandardRb instead of RuboCop. It enforces fewer rules, but on the other hand doesn’t permit any configuration, and it has better defaults.

@bquorning bquorning force-pushed the bquorning/standardrb branch 3 times, most recently from 6e521ab to 3f11e35 Compare November 5, 2025 12:04
StandardRb cannot be configured, and that's a Good Thing™
No functional changes, only changing single quotes to double quotes.
No functional changes, only indentation and other whitespace issues,
plus some other simple layout fixes.
These changes were all done with `standardrb --fix`.
These changes were all done with `standardrb --fix-unsafely`.
@bquorning bquorning force-pushed the bquorning/standardrb branch from 3f11e35 to b390629 Compare November 5, 2025 12:53
These changes were all done manually.

Also, add .git-blame-ignore-revs to make `git blame` ignore purely style
changing commits.
But don't use require_relative from spec/ to lib/ and vice versa.
@bquorning bquorning force-pushed the bquorning/standardrb branch from b390629 to d5d84ce Compare November 5, 2025 12:58
@bquorning bquorning marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2025 12:58
@bquorning bquorning requested a review from a team as a code owner November 5, 2025 12:58
@bquorning bquorning merged commit 481f999 into main Nov 5, 2025
8 checks passed
@bquorning bquorning deleted the bquorning/standardrb branch November 5, 2025 13:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants