Skip to content

Conversation

@genu
Copy link
Contributor

@genu genu commented Aug 5, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the required version of a database dependency to improve compatibility with newer releases.

ymc9 and others added 19 commits June 17, 2025 13:08
merge dev to main (3.0.0-alpha.4)
merge dev to main (v3.0.0-alpha.6)
merge dev to main (v3.0.0-alpha.13)
merge dev to main (v3.0.0-alpha.14)
merge dev to main (v3.0.0-alpha.15)
merge dev to main (v3.0.0-alpha.16)
merge dev to main (v3.0.0-alpha.17)
merge dev to main (v3.0.0-alpha.18)
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 5, 2025 14:47
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The peer dependency version for "better-sqlite3" in the @zenstackhq/runtime package was updated from "^11.8.1" to "^12.2.0" within the package.json file. No other modifications or changes to exported or public entities were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Peer Dependency Update
packages/runtime/package.json
Updated "better-sqlite3" peer dependency version from "^11.8.1" to "^12.2.0".

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A hop in the garden, a version anew,
"better-sqlite3" gets a shiny, fresh hue.
Just one line changed, no need to frown,
The runtime package won’t let us down.
With dependencies spruced, we’re ready to run—
Another small change, another hop done! 🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the better-sqlite3 peer dependency version range from ^11.8.1 to ^12.2.0, indicating a major version upgrade that likely includes breaking changes.

  • Updates the minimum required version of better-sqlite3 to version 12.2.0
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

packages/runtime/package.json:78

  • Version 12.2.0 of better-sqlite3 may not exist. As of my last knowledge update in January 2025, better-sqlite3 was at version 11.x. Please verify this version exists before updating the dependency.
        "better-sqlite3": "^12.2.0",

@ymc9 ymc9 changed the base branch from main to dev August 6, 2025 09:11
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @genu ! I've updated the lock file and am merging it.

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit 90dbc1b into zenstackhq:dev Aug 6, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants