Skip to content

Conversation

@zephyrbot
Copy link

@zephyrbot zephyrbot commented May 7, 2024

Backport 94cd46d from #72300.
Backport 5fb62ca from #72036.

Fixes #69297

@zephyrbot zephyrbot requested a review from nandojve as a code owner May 7, 2024 07:31
@zephyrbot zephyrbot added Backport Backport PR and backport failure issues area: UpdateHub UpdateHub labels May 7, 2024
After the changes introduced by #50816 the UpdateHub could not decode
anymore the JSON object. This introduce missing parsing definitions
to allow JSON parser undertood the correct UpdateHub probe object.

Fixes #69297

Signed-off-by: Gerson Fernando Budke <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 5fb62ca)
@nandojve nandojve force-pushed the backport-72300-to-v3.5-branch branch from cfc93c3 to 46523e5 Compare May 7, 2024 16:49
This fixes compatibility with recent bootutils API.

Fixes #69297

Signed-off-by: Gerson Fernando Budke <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 94cd46d)
@nandojve nandojve force-pushed the backport-72300-to-v3.5-branch branch from 46523e5 to fe928a8 Compare May 7, 2024 17:09
@nandojve
Copy link
Member

nandojve commented Jun 2, 2024

Hi @henrikbrixandersen ,

This is the same patch introduced for v3.6. Do you thing will be possible to merge it?
There is no need to create a release for this and the patch on the branch is more then enough.

@henrikbrixandersen henrikbrixandersen added this to the v3.5.1 milestone Jun 2, 2024
@henrikbrixandersen
Copy link
Member

This is the same patch introduced for v3.6. Do you thing will be possible to merge it?

I would think so, yes. It is up to the v3.5 release managers (@jhedberg and @fabiobaltieri), though.

@jhedberg jhedberg merged commit 77df445 into v3.5-branch Jun 2, 2024
@nashif nashif deleted the backport-72300-to-v3.5-branch branch November 16, 2024 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area: UpdateHub UpdateHub Backport Backport PR and backport failure issues

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants