-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.8k
Zephyr toolchain / linking improvements #78320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
fabiobaltieri
merged 8 commits into
zephyrproject-rtos:main
from
tejlmand:toolchain/linker_library_improvements
Oct 4, 2024
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6817339
cmake: linker: Use the same linker for cmake checks and final build
jonathonpenix aadb9d1
cmake: improve Zephyr link phase
tejlmand d07d52e
cmake: PROPERTY flag support on compile options and link libraries
tejlmand 669d625
cmake: make TARGET optional in set_linker_property()
tejlmand 0cadd94
cmake: move specs compiler and linker flags to toolchain properties
tejlmand 361b553
manifest: update picolibc to support the new c_library property
tejlmand b21510c
cmake: detect LLVM picolibc and newlib support
tejlmand 3b8e621
manifest: update zephyr-lang-rust to always link runtime libs first
tejlmand File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we eventually plan on supporting clang's
--config
using this same mechanism?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking of that, and some clang/LLVM releases, like LLVM for Arm, does provide dedicated configs for this, but i'm unsure how well established / standardized this principle is, so for a start it's kept a bit independent in
cmake/compiler/clang/target.cmake
.and also because it's needed for the existing compile check functionality.