doc: release: NXP contributions #81236
Conversation
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
from
09f8c44 to
56f60ee
Compare
mmahadevan108
requested review from
EmilioCBen,
danieldegrasse,
decsny and
dleach02
doc/releases/release-notes-4.0.rst
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not sure if this needs to go in the release notes as it isn't exposed to users, it's basically just a refactor of where some code was in the tree
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
3 times, most recently
from
394d15a to
36ec187
Compare
|
@JarmouniA, @decsny, your change suggestions have been integrated. Thanks. |
doc/releases/release-notes-4.0.rst
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
definitely not something worth mentioning in release notes :) drop the entire change since you're also introducing a duplicated bullet item with "Added two new build ..."
doc/releases/release-notes-4.0.rst
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
as before, don't go to the level of details where you're describing changes or tweaks being made to tests (to put it differently: if the release notes are effectively going to the level of detail were it's one bullet point per PR or commit, then we'd rather point users directly to the GitHub interface to see what's new by themselves :) )
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
from
36ec187 to
cbbf6b1
Compare
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ed9817a to
9600a29
Compare
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
from
9600a29 to
de48cf9
Compare
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
from
de48cf9 to
ffe15d5
Compare
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
from
ffe15d5 to
6b474c0
Compare
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
from
6b474c0 to
77ec768
Compare
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
from
77ec768 to
26fd307
Compare
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
from
26fd307 to
9553e0b
Compare
Adding NXP's contributions to v4.0 Signed-off-by: Yves Vandervennet <[email protected]>
yvanderv
force-pushed
the
release-notes-v4.0.0-nxp-contributions
branch
from
9553e0b to
5e7a691
Compare
|
@mmahadevan108 @danieldegrasse @kartben , please review. |
| * DAC | ||
|
|
||
| * DAC API now supports specifying channel path as internal. Support has been added in STM32 drivers. | ||
| * Updated the NXP counter_mcux_lptmr driver to support multiple instances of the lptmr |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry I missed this- these look like they should be in the "Counter" section, not DAC
| :dtcompatible:`we,wsen-hids-2525020210002` humidity sensor driver. | ||
|
|
||
| * Added general samples for triggers | ||
| * Added driver for NXP's fxls8974 accelerometer |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is already mentioned in the nxp section
| * Together with the deprecation of :ref:`native_posix<native_posix>`, many tests which were | ||
| explicitly run in native_posix now run in :ref:`native_sim<native_sim>` instead. | ||
| native_posix as a platform remains tested though. | ||
| * Added documentation (readme) for the erase_blocks flash test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is really not that important
| * Extended the tests of counter_basic_api with a testcase for counters wihtout alarms | ||
| * Excluded NXP RW612 based boards from the WiFi test suite, as these boards require binary blobs | ||
| be downloaded in order to build as expected |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not something for release notes
| * Added support for testing SDMMC devices to the fatfs API test | ||
| * Extended net/vlan to add IPv6 prefix config to each vlan-iface | ||
| * Enhanced the camera fixture test by adding a color bar to enable automation | ||
| * Fixed floating point logging issue in the video driver sample code |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sounds like a really minor change , not sure why this is mentioned?
|
I will be dismissing my review so that this can be approved by others if they feel this is good enough. |
|
Mahesh is going to follow up with a PR to address the last comments |
11 participants
Adding NXP's contributions to v4.0