Skip to content

Conversation

dsseng
Copy link
Member

@dsseng dsseng commented Aug 2, 2025

As clarified by the subsystem maintainers, wait should be treated as a
boolean, not a duration.

See #94020 and #92923 (comment) for clarifications.

This change has not been tested on the ESP32 platform, as I do not possess any boards. Please verify if necessary.

Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov [email protected]

@dsseng dsseng force-pushed the fix-esp32-ipm-wait branch from 870305d to c2123eb Compare August 2, 2025 20:37
As clarified by the subsystem maintainers, wait should be treated as a
boolean, not a duration.

Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov <[email protected]>
@dsseng dsseng force-pushed the fix-esp32-ipm-wait branch from c2123eb to 7d068c4 Compare August 2, 2025 20:37
@dsseng dsseng requested a review from uLipe August 2, 2025 20:38
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Aug 2, 2025

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link
Contributor

@sylvioalves sylvioalves left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested OK.

@jhedberg jhedberg merged commit 5eecc55 into zephyrproject-rtos:main Aug 6, 2025
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area: IPM Inter-Processor Mailbox platform: ESP32 Espressif ESP32

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants