-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.2k
[v4.2-branch] west: Update picolibc to version being proposed for SDK 0.17.4 #94043
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[v4.2-branch] west: Update picolibc to version being proposed for SDK 0.17.4 #94043
Conversation
We're trying to re-synchronize picolibc bits across Zephyr and the Zephyr SDK. At this point, SDK 0.17.3 is missing some minor updates found in the module and the module is missing a commit from the SDK. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
We're trying to re-synchronize picolibc bits across Zephyr and the Zephyr SDK. At this point, SDK 0.17.3 is missing some minor updates found in the module and the module is missing a commit from the SDK. Zephyr PR: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#94043 Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
|
The following west manifest projects have changed revision in this Pull Request:
✅ All manifest checks OK Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the Manifest GitHub Action. |
|
@dkalowsk This is part of the effort to make a new Zephyr 4.2.x and SDK 0.17.x release with synchronised picolibc version. This is pulling a picolibc commit that is non-code change (only has to do with toolchain discovery of picolibc) to keep the Zephyr 4.2 picolibc synchronised with the SDK 0.17 picolibc. |
|
We're trying to re-synchronize picolibc bits across Zephyr and the Zephyr SDK. At this point, SDK 0.17.3 is missing some minor updates found in the module and the module is missing a commit from the SDK. Zephyr PR: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#94043 Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
@stephanosio sorry was on vacation and missed this. Happy to merge but needs an issue to fix it. @keith-packard you got an open issue to mark as fixes? |
This doesn't actually fix any problems when using picolibc as a module... We're actually unwinding some changes which aren't relevant for Zephyr and then merging one change that only affects the SDK. The last picolibc update pulled in those irrelevant changes and it shouldn't have. The SDK fix makes it possible to build boot loaders using picolibc. Happy to create an issue which explains this, but the net result is that this change won't have any effect when using the picolibc Zephyr module |
|
@keith-packard right I've been following the discussion in the SDK project. Unfortunately I will need to ask you to file an issue as that is now the blocker for this PR to be merged. I don't have permissions to bypass that check and do think we'd want an issue for an end user to see the full history for why this change was made. |
c1adc50
into
zephyrproject-rtos:v4.2-branch



We're trying to re-synchronize picolibc bits across Zephyr and the Zephyr SDK. At this point, SDK 0.17.3 is missing some minor updates found in the module and the module is missing a commit from the SDK.
SDK PR: zephyrproject-rtos/sdk-ng#991
Fixes #94774