boards: arm: Update WeAct STM32H562 CoreBoard

[heronet]

• Add board Image
• Update board name and symbols to match other boards

And because they have multiple H5 boards now

[heronet]

I renamed the board in release notes too as it was causing the checks to fail. Please let me know if I wan not allowed to do that

[str4t0m]

There seem to be two boards from WeAct with a STM32H562 SoC called Core board, so it is not really expressive either? I think you should additionally include 64Pin/100Pin in the name or alternatively more from the Soc name.

[heronet]

There seem to be two boards from WeAct with a STM32H562 SoC called Core board, so it is not really expressive either? I think you should additionally include 64Pin/100Pin in the name or alternatively more from the Soc name.

Well they have the exact same 64 pin shaped board for 4 mcus (STM32F446RE, F405, F412, and H562) and they are all named similarly.
In some other families when they have 2 boards using the same MCU, they call the bigger one "LongBoard". Maybe the 100 pin one could be called Long Board or 100 pin when it is added? So that the base model remains base model and the newer one could be an "extended" model

[str4t0m]

Hm, naming and consistency are really not a thing for WeAct. Nearly every board is called (Mini) Core board. No mather the formfactor or if they spin multiple boards with the same soc. So I don't want to block.
However it would be good to add an entry in boards/deprecated.cmake file.

No strong feelings about this, and don't want to block.

[heronet]

Hm, naming and consistency are really not a thing for WeAct. Nearly every board is called (Mini) Core board. No mather the formfactor or if they spin multiple boards with the same soc. So I don't want to block. However it would be good to add an entry in boards/deprecated.cmake file.

Yeah their naming is not the best. I added a some 7 of their boards recently. I tried to keep the naming similar to the existing ones. Now looking at the list a few of them don't quite fit the pattern. That's mainly the reason I'm trying to organize them a little. This board specially was too ambigous considering the amount of H5 boards they had and there being no board image.

I added the old name to boards/deprecated.cmake file.

[heronet]

I did a rebase because there were some conflicts

[sonarqubecloud]

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud